August 23, 2020
The Fascist philosophy behind Antifa.
Their beliefs come from one Herbert Marcuse, a Marxist philosopher who cut his teeth with Nazi Martin Heidegger at the University of Freiburg and later The Institute of Social Research aka the Frankfurt School. He is the creator of Critical Theory which postulates:
Critical theoryis defined as "a philosophical approach to culture, and especially to literature, that seeks to confront the social, historical, and ideological forces and structures that produce and constrain it.â€
This might sound benign, but in practice, critical theory is the shallow analysis of politics, history, art, and society through the lens of power dynamics. It places the world into a box of oppressor vs. oppressed and insists that those who are oppressed are "good†and those who are oppressors are "evil.â€
In an article for Quillette, Uri Harris describes critical theory as follows:
This is achieved through "repressive tolerance" meaning the "powerless" or rather the revolutionaries have the right and duty to use violence and hatred to foment their revolution, and freedom of speech only serves the rulers.By identifying the distorting effects power had on society’s beliefs and values, [the founders of critical theory] believed they could achieve a more accurate picture of the world. And when people saw things as they really were, they would liberate themselves. "Theory,†they suggested, always serves the interests of certain people; traditional theory, because it is uncritical towards power, automatically serves the powerful, while critical theory, because it unmasks these interests, serves the powerless.
If violence is justified to "restore the power balance" what is to prevent the other side from using it? And what happens when the balance of power tips? Anyone remember Robespierre?
Anyway, this is a terrific article.
One quibble; the author argues nobody really knows what Fascism is. I disagree; we have a very clear guide to what it is; Benito Mussolini wrote The Doctrine of Fascism which explains it quite clearly.
And if you want to understand it read Rousseau's The Social Contract. Rousseau invented both socialism and fascism there; he argued that all social structures are a mere compact, an expression of the collective Will of the People. Socialism was thus born because the People could choose to share all wealth, as indeed Rousseau saw they had every right. And Fascism? In order to promote this sea change in economics Rousseau argued for the deification of the state as the ultimate expression of that collective Will, and he saw a kind of veneration of the State - of the Nation - as the key to breaking the old allegiances to Church and religion. Socialism and Fascism are two heads of the same monster. Mussolini (who had been the editor of Italy's socialist newspaper) saw Fascism as being the next step in socialism; having a spiritual dimension rather than just an economic one. (Mussolini repeatedly said he rejected Socialism, but not because it was wrong but just incomplete.)
But they are all cut from the same cloth and Mussolini would not have argued against that proposition.
Antifa is in fact Fascist and Socialist. It's quite clear. They seek the destruction of traditional Liberal Western beliefs, and the destruction of the influence of the Church (notice how Churches have been attacked by BLM, Antifa's kissing cousin) in the last year. They believe in imposing their will on the nation, to move it where they wish.
Mussolini says:
[...]
No action is exempt from moral judgment; no activity can be despoiled of the value which a moral purpose confers on all things. Therefore life, as conceived of by the Fascist, is serious, austere, and religious; all its manifestations are poised in a world sustained by moral forces and subject to spiritual responsibilities. The Fascist disdains an "easy" life
[...]
In the Fascist conception of history, man is man only by virtue of the spiritual process to which he contributes as a member of the family, the social group, the nation, and in function of history to which all nations bring their contribution.
[...]
Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal, will of man as a historic entity
[...]
Fascism stands for liberty, and for the only liberty worth having, the liberty of the State and of the individual within the State (13). The Fascist conception of the State is all embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism, is totalitarian, and the Fascist State - a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values - interprets, develops, and potentates the whole life of a people.
[...]
Now that the succession of the reÂgime is open we must not be fainthearted. We must rush forward; if the present regime is to be superseded we must take its place
[...]
In rejecting democracy, Fascism rejects the absurd conventional lie of political equalitarianism, the habit of collective irresponsibility, the myth of felicity and indefinite progress.
At any rate, everything old is new again. We are seeing the new Nazis fighting in the name of opposing Fascism. It's fascinating, but it's real.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:19 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 977 words, total size 8 kb.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at August 24, 2020 01:48 PM (S3Uvu)
The foot soldiers are different; they just think fascism is racism and capitalism and that's about that. Fools.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at August 25, 2020 10:33 AM (/hvMw)
37 queries taking 0.2081 seconds, 161 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.