Murdering Memorials Juneteenth Edition
Timothy Birdnow
There is an interesting discussion going on on the KTVI Channel 2 News Facebook page. They were talking about Juneteenth, and with the statue iconoclastic controversy fresh in mind a bit of a discussion broke out. Here is a snippet including yours truly:
Wayne says:
Since everyone is so hell bent on erasing past history, how about we
only report what happens on any given day and anything prior to the
current day is erased and can't be spoken about again. As they say 'the
past is past - forget about it'.
Katie replied:
Wayne you don’t celebrate the past? I think you misunderstand the removal of
certain racist, sexist, and rapist monuments being removed so that we
as a country may move forward in a positive way. For instance, I have
known as a kid and still know not to enter an establishment that hangs
confederate flags(it stands for white supremacy and I’m not allowed)
I replied
I understand your reluctance to go into a place with a
Confederate BATTLE flag (most people wouldn't recognize the actual
Confederate flag) and I certainly would not fly one, but I think you
misunderstand the people who do. In most cases it's not a symbol of
racism to them, but rather a pride in their southern heritage and a
symbol of a sense of independence. I think a lot of people who do fly
those would be surprised at your interpretation.
In many it is insensitivity, not white supremacy. Not all, surely, and
you will find a few who are racist, but I suspect the majority are not.
I fear whites and blacks see things differently; whites see a statue
of, say, Jefferson Davis (who did not want to be President of the
Confederacy and supposedly broke out in tears when he was told he was
elected) as a memorial to a chapter in history and to states rights.
Blacks see it as a symbol of slavery, racism, and white supremacism.
But that is not true of all black people; many in the south see those
statues the same way as their white neighbors. Charles Barkley, for
example, said he never worried about these statues one way or another.
Anger at them appears to be a rather modern manifestation. There are
bigger fish to fry, both in America and elsewhere, in my opinion.
Slavery is still practiced in Africa, for instance. I think that would
be a more fruitful target of angst. Be that as it may, what will stop a
future generation from tearing down statues of Harriett Tubman, or
Martin Luther King, when they become culturally unpopular? Erasing your
past is a dangerous game. It's how tyrants have traditionally
controlled a population. I am of a mind that we should remember all of
it so we don't make the same mistakes again. Nobody in history is
perfect; you have to judge a person by the times they lived in. It
should also be pointed out that a man like Jefferson no doubt kept his
slaves to protect them; a free man was in great peril in those days
because some jackass would come along and try to claim he was a runaway
and the freedman would wind up in worse shape than before. It was a
common practice by abolitionists to officially keep their slaves so
they would be kept safe and be provided for. There were black
slaveholders too, I might add, quite a few of them, and many of them
had large holdings of slaves for this same reason. So if we tear down
Jefferson statues because he owned slaves we do everyone a great
disservice. Anyway, those are my thoughts on the matter.
Dana asks to add some ideas:
As to the idea of forgetting, or ignoring, the past, we do so at great peril. We really need to know what was done, good and bad, because we need to be able to evaluate where we were and how far we have come. Only then can we begin to determine how far we need to go. This relates to just about everything in life, not just race relations. It relates to the environment (and although we do a better job than most countries, I don't think anyone would say that we couldn't improve in this respect). It relates to food production: the "jury is still out" regarding genetically-modified foods. We have to evaluate all of these things relative to a starting point, and how can we do that if we throw out the past?
This is just a start. But we have to have a start.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:50 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 775 words, total size 5 kb.
1
They need to make sure that people do not remember the freedoms that they used to have.
Posted by: Bill H at June 21, 2020 08:19 AM (vMiSr)
2
Good point, Bill. It's also well to remember that some of these cretins don't even realize that those are freedoms, because they've never known anything else, and they're so woefully uneducated in history that they don't know anybody else didn't have them too.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at June 21, 2020 01:29 PM (xbZgF)
3
Bingo for both of you guys!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at June 22, 2020 09:30 AM (06POM)
4
<a href="https://statusriver.com/romantic-status-in-english/">romantic status in english</a>
Posted by: Ananya pandey at June 26, 2020 02:26 AM (/iiJ0)
Posted by: Ananya pandey at June 26, 2020 02:26 AM (/iiJ0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
24kb generated in CPU 0.6143, elapsed 2.9227 seconds.
37 queries taking 2.9113 seconds, 164 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.