November 18, 2019

The New Formula to Calculate Your Dog's Age in Human Years

Dana Mathewson

OK, folks, as you know, we occasionally step aside from the political arena to address other matters of paramount importance. And for dog owners, this might be one. We (yep, those who know me are aware that my family consists of myself, my wife and a beloved canine) have for years been skeptical about the 1:7 ratio. Well, check this out.

Scientists have gained new insight into the epigenetic clock that controls how dogs age and have devised a new formula to pinpoint exactly how old that good boy or girl in your life is.

The researchers studied DNA methylation, or chemical modifications to certain DNA segments, within the genomes of 104 labrador retrievers, all ranging between 4 weeks and 16 years of age. It turns out we age in similar ways, the team reports in a paper published to the preprint server bioRxiv.

In humans, DNA methylation—the addition of organic compounds called methyl groups to specific segments of our DNA—can reveal the impact of disease, lifestyle, and genetics on our DNA. Using this information, scientists have been able to create an epigenetic clock, of sorts, to better understand how we age. Scientists have learned that other animals like mice and wolves experience DNA methylation. Now, they’re using this research to understand the process of aging in man’s best friend.

Ultimately, certain regions of both the labrador and human genome—areas with high rates of mutation—show similar rates of methylation. A dog’s life stages largely sync up with our own; puppies and babies start teething at roughly equivalent ages, for example.

Whether you have a pitbull, pug, or Pembroke Welsh corgi, your pup will reach puberty at around 10 months and will likely die before turning 20. (Yes, it pains us to write that, too.) Scientists have long known that dogs are susceptible to many of the same age-related diseases that we are, such as cancer, arthritis, and heart disease.

The researchers also devised a new way to calculate a dog’s age, but it's arguably more complicated than simply multiplying by seven. To calculate the age, you’ll have to multiply the natural logarithm of your pup’s age by 16 and then add 31. Here’s the equation:

16 x ln(your dog’s age in human years) + 31

 

Rewind! Make that your dog's actual age. We are trying to calculate his age in human years and don't at this point know them, of course.

Super simple, right? (The researchers also a included a handy conversion tool here.) If you're wondering why your 2-year-old dog clocks in at around 40 human years, it's because his epigenetic clock ticks a bit faster than yours, but slows down as he ages.

The team hopes to expand its research to include additional dog species, and there are plenty of other research teams that are diving into a dog’s genome to unlock even more secrets.

The article is here, https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/math/a29830394/dog-years-human-years/ and it does contain a calculator in case you don't have one that includes the log function.

I thought my dog was 77 years old, turns out he's only 69! But the thing that makes me doubt all this is that I have read articles, and seen with my own eyes, where big dogs do not live as long as small ones. And this article pays no attention to that.

Ah, well...

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:46 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 567 words, total size 5 kb.

1 I always thought that 7 to 1 ration was silly, too.  If you have a twenty year old dog that would make him 140 - that just didn't make sense.  And it did seem dogs grew up faster but then aged slower than do we.

Unfortunately I don't see that formula catching on with the general public.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at November 19, 2019 07:05 AM (RRum6)

2 The general public may not have access to "ln" (log function) either. Heck, the general public probably doesn't care. We've got that "ln" in the calculator that ships with iPhones.


I was reading the Apple News feed on my phone last night when I got this, and also found an article by a liberal (of course) blogger, black woman, who wrote about her elderly dog and said when he goes she won't get another, and turns out it was about how she feels guilty about the food and other resources he uses, and... well, you can figure all the environmental crap in the article. Frankly it was disgusting. She stopped short of saying when he got near the end she'd starve him... and her daughter, and herself (I'm exaggerating, probably). There was a photo of her, looking more than a little smug.

It was obvious she didn't have the same connection to him that Martha and I have to Bijou!

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at November 19, 2019 06:37 PM (LVmqo)

3 That is an interesting point, Louis Robinson. Age is different for different creatures, and even for different people.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at January 21, 2020 07:14 AM (ubm9I)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




25kb generated in CPU 0.0204, elapsed 0.1883 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.1816 seconds, 162 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 30720
  • Files: 5335
  • Bytes: 1617.3M
  • CPU Time: 56:10
  • Queries: 1121520

Content

  • Posts: 28566
  • Comments: 126044

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0