September 07, 2019
Guess what? Trump was right about Alabama being in the path of Hurricane Dorian, according to NOAA.
From NPR:
CNN and the rest of the mainstream media spent days mocking the President, claiming he lied and was using a fake map. Turns out CNN was the liar.
The parent agency of the National Weather Service said late Friday that President Trump was correct when he claimed earlier this week that Hurricane Dorian had threatened the state of Alabama.
The article continues:The surprise announcement in an unsigned statement by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration essentially endorsed Trump's Sunday tweet saying that Alabama will "most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated."
And CNN
mislabeled
Alabama as Mississippi in THEIR hurricane map.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:58 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 2 kb.
Please correct me if I have the wrong alphabet outfit here.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 07, 2019 04:38 PM (wb/Ig)
What you will not get is that in 2005 NOAA set up a new set of weather stations because the existing ones were found to be in places affected by "heat islands" such as city streets and parking lots, and that the new, rural, NOAA weather stations have shown that there has been no warming trend since 2005.
Posted by: Bill H at September 08, 2019 08:39 AM (vMiSr)
Bill H. you are absolutely correct; NOAA's data sets were horribly corrupted. Anthony Watts made his fame by running the survey of the surface stations and showing the horrible temperature bias in those stations. Also, they have been systematically removing stations and then doing an average of two other stations, some of which were hundreds of miles apart. Very bad data, indeed. And when the new data from the new stations shows no planetary warming? They have to "smooth" it to show a trend because, well, they are just SURE it must be getting hot.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 08, 2019 10:28 AM (IWsoJ)
Of course, all the Warmiacs whose reliance on the old data produced such skewed reports will NOT bother to correct their reports, nor issue any apologies.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 08, 2019 03:16 PM (rIYC+)
37 queries taking 1.2138 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
