March 19, 2019
Media Lies about New Zealand Shooter
Timothy Birdnow
The news media immediately declared the mosque shooter in New Zealand to be a "right-wing terrorist" and have subsequently used it to tar conservatives and Trump supporters. But is that the case"
John Lott, [link-writing in Townhall, disagree[/link] As Lott points out, in a Q and A type discussion in the killer's own manifesto, the murderer says ""as a policy maker and leader? Dear God no!" in answer to the question "Do you support Donald Trump?"
In fact he calls himself an "eco-fascist", and saw Communist China as the ideal nation, according to his hard-to-find manifesto. He DOES refer to the Muslims as invaders, but in a broader sense; he sees humanity as invaders, overbreeding and overpopulating the world. He's an eco-terrorist, not a racial terrorist.
So why go after Muslims? Not because of their religion or race, but because they are immigrants who are going to further bespoil the pristine land. See, he doesn't want ANYBODY there, and new people need to be strongly discouraged.
He was a great admirer of Sir Oswald Mosley, a leftist Euro-socialist. This guy was about as right wing as Adolf Hitler. Of course, the Left has used that blood libel on conservatives for decades, but Hitler was solidly a man of the Left. He called his party a socialist one, and he advocated policies of central planning, government control, limited civil liberties, etc. in the socialist fashion.
He supported minimum wage increases, increased unionization, "racial autonomists" ,hates "the one percent". He says he made the attack in an effort to promote gun control. Some right winger...
Naturally, the left wing media went into high gear; with The Daily Beast calling manifesto misinformation because it did not fit with their preconceptions of a racist Islamophobe. From the article:
By Friday morning, the shooting and its accompanying manifesto had set off a series of fights in the media and online. Donald Trump Jr. liked a far-right YouTuber’s tweet about the attack, which falsely claimed that the shooter admired communism.
Someone with advance knowledge of the attack announced the killings in advance on the forum 8chan, linking to the manifesto and a Facebook account where he then live-streamed the shooting.
The recently registered social media accounts were front-loaded with white supremacist talking points. The linked manifesto was laden with 4chan memes and apparently ironic references to contradictory figures and ideologies he claimed to admire.
The shooting suspect’s manifesto even included a meta commentary on what he was trying to accomplish, hoping that the mass shooting would raise tensions between the left and right and set off a civil war in the United States.
Those provocations include an apparently trolling mention of Owens, a controversial right-wing personality who works for conservative campus group Turning Point USA. The manifesto’s writer claimed that he had been influenced "above all†by Owens, but that he had to "disavow†her "extreme†actions.
End excerpt.
It is interesting to note that videos of the shooting have disappeared from the wen and from the world at large; New Zealand kicked Rupert Murdoch's Sky News off television for running them. More so, the actual manifesto itself is very difficult to find; I tried to download it and received a Forbidden error. Interesting. It's as if someone doesn't want the public at large to know what was actually said.
Now I am all for not giving creeps like this the attention they crave, but if his actions are going to be used against Conservatives then I want the whole story told. It's as if the gatekeepers of knowledge don't want that at all, preffering a pre-baked narrative.
After considerable searching radio talk show host Dennis Prager found a copy and posted it here. It's very long, so be prepared to spend a lot of time with it.
A few final observations:
First, there are not one but TWO mosques in Christchurch, a city of 388,400 whose motto is Founded in Faith, Rich in the Fulfillment thereof, Strong in Hope for the Future. The last census showed a scant 1,974 of people from the Middle East/Latin America/Africa. There are a few more from the Philippines and from India, but the Muslim population is fairly low. Why two mosques? Well, the name of the town makes it attractive for Muslims. They are forever trying to expand their religion at others' expense.
Second, there are nearly 1.5 million firearms in the hands of three hundred thousand licensed gun owners in the country, and the Prime Minister wants to grab those weapons. This is the ideal incident to move gun confiscation laws forward. I guess she didn't hear about the recent school shooting in Brazil; Brazil has a near total ban on firearms possession by private individuals, and is the poster child for gun control.
Third, we should mourn the loss of anyone and should pray for the souls of the deceased and their families.
Fourth, we should understand that Islam is spread at the point of a gun if necessary, and should not allow things like this to weaken our resolve to resist it. Islam demands everyone submit - everyone. There are no minority rights in Islam; you don't get to reject the moral code of Islam. Christianity seeks converts to save the souls of the lost, while Islam seeks converts to punish. Islam is all about punishing; instead of trying to keep people out of Hell it seeks to create hell on this Earth for those who do not obey them. While we have to pray for the victims and offer our sympathy we should bear in mind that the Muslim world has often used such things as a tool of advancement. Be wary.
At any rate, do not believe what the media is telling us on this story.
The news media immediately declared the mosque shooter in New Zealand to be a "right-wing terrorist" and have subsequently used it to tar conservatives and Trump supporters. But is that the case"
John Lott, [link-writing in Townhall, disagree[/link] As Lott points out, in a Q and A type discussion in the killer's own manifesto, the murderer says ""as a policy maker and leader? Dear God no!" in answer to the question "Do you support Donald Trump?"
In fact he calls himself an "eco-fascist", and saw Communist China as the ideal nation, according to his hard-to-find manifesto. He DOES refer to the Muslims as invaders, but in a broader sense; he sees humanity as invaders, overbreeding and overpopulating the world. He's an eco-terrorist, not a racial terrorist.
So why go after Muslims? Not because of their religion or race, but because they are immigrants who are going to further bespoil the pristine land. See, he doesn't want ANYBODY there, and new people need to be strongly discouraged.
He was a great admirer of Sir Oswald Mosley, a leftist Euro-socialist. This guy was about as right wing as Adolf Hitler. Of course, the Left has used that blood libel on conservatives for decades, but Hitler was solidly a man of the Left. He called his party a socialist one, and he advocated policies of central planning, government control, limited civil liberties, etc. in the socialist fashion.
He supported minimum wage increases, increased unionization, "racial autonomists" ,hates "the one percent". He says he made the attack in an effort to promote gun control. Some right winger...
Naturally, the left wing media went into high gear; with The Daily Beast calling manifesto misinformation because it did not fit with their preconceptions of a racist Islamophobe. From the article:
By Friday morning, the shooting and its accompanying manifesto had set off a series of fights in the media and online. Donald Trump Jr. liked a far-right YouTuber’s tweet about the attack, which falsely claimed that the shooter admired communism.
Someone with advance knowledge of the attack announced the killings in advance on the forum 8chan, linking to the manifesto and a Facebook account where he then live-streamed the shooting.
The recently registered social media accounts were front-loaded with white supremacist talking points. The linked manifesto was laden with 4chan memes and apparently ironic references to contradictory figures and ideologies he claimed to admire.
The shooting suspect’s manifesto even included a meta commentary on what he was trying to accomplish, hoping that the mass shooting would raise tensions between the left and right and set off a civil war in the United States.
Those provocations include an apparently trolling mention of Owens, a controversial right-wing personality who works for conservative campus group Turning Point USA. The manifesto’s writer claimed that he had been influenced "above all†by Owens, but that he had to "disavow†her "extreme†actions.
End excerpt.
It is interesting to note that videos of the shooting have disappeared from the wen and from the world at large; New Zealand kicked Rupert Murdoch's Sky News off television for running them. More so, the actual manifesto itself is very difficult to find; I tried to download it and received a Forbidden error. Interesting. It's as if someone doesn't want the public at large to know what was actually said.
Now I am all for not giving creeps like this the attention they crave, but if his actions are going to be used against Conservatives then I want the whole story told. It's as if the gatekeepers of knowledge don't want that at all, preffering a pre-baked narrative.
After considerable searching radio talk show host Dennis Prager found a copy and posted it here. It's very long, so be prepared to spend a lot of time with it.
A few final observations:
First, there are not one but TWO mosques in Christchurch, a city of 388,400 whose motto is Founded in Faith, Rich in the Fulfillment thereof, Strong in Hope for the Future. The last census showed a scant 1,974 of people from the Middle East/Latin America/Africa. There are a few more from the Philippines and from India, but the Muslim population is fairly low. Why two mosques? Well, the name of the town makes it attractive for Muslims. They are forever trying to expand their religion at others' expense.
Second, there are nearly 1.5 million firearms in the hands of three hundred thousand licensed gun owners in the country, and the Prime Minister wants to grab those weapons. This is the ideal incident to move gun confiscation laws forward. I guess she didn't hear about the recent school shooting in Brazil; Brazil has a near total ban on firearms possession by private individuals, and is the poster child for gun control.
Third, we should mourn the loss of anyone and should pray for the souls of the deceased and their families.
Fourth, we should understand that Islam is spread at the point of a gun if necessary, and should not allow things like this to weaken our resolve to resist it. Islam demands everyone submit - everyone. There are no minority rights in Islam; you don't get to reject the moral code of Islam. Christianity seeks converts to save the souls of the lost, while Islam seeks converts to punish. Islam is all about punishing; instead of trying to keep people out of Hell it seeks to create hell on this Earth for those who do not obey them. While we have to pray for the victims and offer our sympathy we should bear in mind that the Muslim world has often used such things as a tool of advancement. Be wary.
At any rate, do not believe what the media is telling us on this story.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 966 words, total size 7 kb.
24kb generated in CPU 0.1944, elapsed 1.1958 seconds.
35 queries taking 1.1897 seconds, 158 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
35 queries taking 1.1897 seconds, 158 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
