July 26, 2019
John McCafee, the cyber security inventor, has gone missing again. The tech guru went on the lam a while back, fleeing Belize after police investigated him for murder. Now Mr. McCafee appears to be running again.
According to C-Net:
"I have good reason to suspect that John McAfee, @theemrsmcafee and other companions have been detained by authorities at their latest port of call," Loggia-Ramirez tweeted on McAfee's account Tuesday.
"If John misses his next check-in, events will be set into motion that I cannot prevent once they have begun. John has secreted data with individuals across the world. I know neither their identities or locations. They will release their payloads if John goes missing."
(2/4) I last spoke with John as his boat was being boarded. The situation was tense but controlled. Our conversation was cut short by authorities confiscating their phones. The bastards wouldn't even give him a cigarette.
— John McAfee (@officialmcafee) July 23, 2019
Mcafee accuses the CIA:
This is weird story from a weird guy. I suspect it will get stranger yet.
Oh, and did I mention McAfee is running for President of the United States?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
04:43 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 295 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at July 26, 2019 09:56 PM (rIYC+)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at July 27, 2019 05:43 AM (uE08a)
But McAfee sold the computer community on the idea that it was better for anti-virus programs to be able to identify each virus individually and zap it, because that's how HIS stuff worked -- despite the fact that it meant that each virus had to be identified and a "killer" had to be developed for it. Anyhow, he conned the whole industry, and they bought it, and Peter Norton (Symantec) went along with it, and pretty soon all the anti-virus programs worked that way. And the programs like Flu-Shot died.
So if you used his (or anybody else's) crap that worked this way, and got a new virus on your machine, you had to somehow identify it, and go to a site that had a single-purpose killer to get rid of it, then wait for updated "definitions" for your anti-virus program to include the ability to kill that new virus. And that's where we are to this day.
That make sense?
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at July 27, 2019 11:13 AM (rIYC+)
I do remember when the computer used to ask you if you intended to download a program. It never does anymore.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at July 29, 2019 09:34 AM (PnO6z)
I was using a different AV that was getting crankier with every newer version and decided to try it. Lo and behold, it worked. On my wife's machine, suddenly it stopped working and I found that Microsoft Security Suite had taken over, but was doing the job OK. Now I have Windows 10 on my machine and Defender is working fine.
And no subscription $$$!
In both cases I made sure I had Windows Firewall rinning full-tilt.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at July 29, 2019 08:46 PM (rIYC+)
I suspect I don't pick up too many viruses; who is making them for such old machines?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at July 30, 2019 06:54 AM (Yt3e+)
37 queries taking 0.2908 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.