August 19, 2019

Is Russia Hiding Another Chernobyl?

Dana Mathewson

Surely the country that colluded with our president to get him into office... Uh, OUCH, nurse. Stop slapping me. uhhhhh...

Oh, just another nightmare. I wonder if I need to change my bourbon. But when I read stuff like this, it is interesting to wonder why the idiots on the left INSIST that Russia helped to get Trump into office. They come off like the Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight, at least with their nukes.

Stephen Green, one of my favorite PJMedia writers, gives us this:

Breaking news from Russia's frozen Northwest, where a total of four nuclear-monitoring stations have been silenced. The Wall Street Journal says that's twice as many as last week, "heightening concerns among observers that Russia is trying to hide evidence from an explosion at a missile-test site this month."

Some background.

Russia has been developing a nuclear-powered cruise missile, the 9M730 Burevestnik or "Petrel" missile. To be clear, that's a missile powered by nuclear fission, not a missile "merely" carrying a nuclear warhead. On August 8, it's believed that a Petrel exploded during testing, killing five employees of Rosatom, Russia’s state-owned nuclear energy producer. Three others were injured. That we know of.

As the Kremlin is wont to do, they at first downplayed the incident, claiming that the amount of radiation released "was less than that of a medical X-ray." Although as The National Interest noted on Saturday, "the village near the explosion has been ordered to evacuate, raising memories of the Chernobyl incident." The same report casts some doubt whether a Petrel cruise missile was involved at all:

Edward Geist, an expert on Russian nuclear history at the RAND Corp. think tank, cautioned that it is premature to assume that the Petrel was the culprit.

"The case that this may be associated with the nuclear cruise missile is pretty circumstantial,” Geist told The National Interest. For example, the site of the accident is a closed Russian military town that is "associated with the testing of all kinds of missiles.”

Perhaps there was an accident involving Petrel. Or, perhaps there was an accident involving another weapon that damaged a Petrel. Or, maybe Russia was testing some other system: among Putin’s much-touted wonder weapons is the nuclear-powered Poseidon robotic torpedo.

If you're having flashbacks to 1986 -- I was a junior in high school, very much the young Cold Warrior, and remember this quite clearly -- so am I. The Soviet Union's outdated and poorly-designed nuclear power station at Chernobyl, Ukraine, suffered an open-air reactor core fire following an explosion on April 26 of that year. Heroic efforts were undertaken to avert an even greater disaster, yet despite nearly 100 deaths at or near the scene, the Kremlin tried to hide the fact that a huge nuclear reactor had just blown up in a small town not far from the capital of the country's second-most important republic. Ever since, the town had been the "Chernobyl Exclusion Zone," and uninhabited.

Two days after the explosion, radiation detectors went wild at Sweden's Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant, more than 600 miles away. The Swedes contacted Soviet authorities behind the scenes, who at first denied that anything was wrong. Days later, Moscow was still downplaying to the West what had happened, all the while evacuating more than 100,000 locals as quietly as possible.

[...]

But we can probably draw two conclusions with some small measure of confidence.

The first is, whatever happened, it's certainly worse than Moscow will admit, given what we know about how Putin's Russia operates, and also what we just learned from that WSJ report. The second is that Putin's Russia, just like the Communist Soviet Union that preceded it, simply isn't capable of playing with matches of this size without putting their neighbors, or perhaps the world, at risk.

It's time to stop playing the I'm-Still-a-Superpower game, Mr. Putin, because you just aren't up to it.

 

 

This is a must-read article, in my estimation. Go here https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/is-russia-hiding-another-chernobyl/ to read it.

A WORD FROM TIM:

I was a bit surprised to learn the Russkies were using a NERVA nuclear rocket system for an ICBM; the NERVA was invented a long time ago but was outlawed by the Outer Space Treaty, since it puts a nuclear reactor in orbit. Essentially the Nerva uses a nuclear reactor (a small one in this case) to superheat rocket exhaust. Since this rocket is intended as a cruise missile it can forego propellant and use compressed air, so it is kind of a hybrid between a jet engine and a nuclear rocket. Air will be the propellant, while the energy will come from a small fission reactor. The fission reactor adds a lot of weight - too much, in many ways, but it will not run out of fuel, so you can keep these missiles circulating. I never thought they would be very practical because of that. Great spacecraft drives, but lousy missile propulsion. Guess I was right.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 04:16 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 832 words, total size 6 kb.

1 Oh, just another nightmare. I wonder if I need to change my bourbon. But when I read stuff like this, it is interesting to wonder why the idiots on the left INSIST that Russia helped to get Trump into office. They come off like the Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight, at least with their nukes.

Posted by: mario games at August 20, 2019 07:30 AM (295tx)

2 I was a bit surprised to learn the Russkies were using a NERVA nuclear rocket system for an ICBM; the NERVA was invented a long time ago but was outlawed by the Outer Space Treaty, since it puts a nuclear reactor in orbit. Essentially the Nerva uses a nuclear reactor (a small one in this case) to superheat rocket exhaust. Since this rocket is intended as a cruise missile it can forego propellant and use compressed air, so it is kind of a hybrid between a jet engine and a nuclear rocket. Air will be the propellant, while the energy will come from a small fission reactor. The fission reactor adds a lot of weight - too much, in many ways, but it will not run out of fuel, so you can keep these missiles circulating. I never thought they would be very practical because of that. Great spacecraft drives, but lousy missile propulsion. Guess I was right.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at August 20, 2019 07:47 AM (aimp/)

3 No comment on this from Bernie "The Red" Sanders. Wonder why?

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at August 20, 2019 09:57 AM (w+lqe)

4 I imagine Red Sanders is trying to figure a way to blame Trump and middle America.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at August 20, 2019 10:21 AM (e6VRg)

5 As in "Hillary sold 'em flawed uranium? But she would have made it right with them if she'd been elected president?"
Yeah, I know it's pretty far-fetched. But so is everything else from the Left these days.

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at August 20, 2019 11:15 AM (w+lqe)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




27kb generated in CPU 0.0839, elapsed 0.2158 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2098 seconds, 164 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 13766
  • Files: 2704
  • Bytes: 786.4M
  • CPU Time: 26:17
  • Queries: 514225

Content

  • Posts: 28551
  • Comments: 125834

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0