The WashingtonPost is
indignant that "hard-line Republicans and conservative commentators are
mounting a whispering campaign against Jamal Khashoggi"Â supposedly in order
to "protect President Trump from criticism of his handling of the dissident
journalist's alleged murder by operatives of Saudi Arabia."
The Post hits these "hardliners" for highlighting Khashoggi's ties to the Muslim Brotherhood,
and claims that "while Khashoggi was once sympathetic to Islamist movements,
he moved toward a more liberal, secular point of view".
In reality, Khashoggi was the real
hardliner, supporting jihad violence and Sharia right up to the time of his
murder -- even in his recent Post columns. This raises questions about
why the paper hired him as a columnist in the first place.