October 22, 2018

How about Trump-Haley in 2020?

Dana Mathewson

From Fox News' Liz Peek.

Nikki Haley has said she will not run for president in 2020. But would she run for vice president in 2020 and then president in 2024? That could be the right path for the U.N. Ambassador, who has announced she will retire at the end of this year and who is definitely presidential material.

It’s a long time until 2024. Some speculate that Haley might run for the Senate should fellow South Carolinian Lindsey Graham be appointed to replace Jeff Sessions as Attorney General after the midterm elections. Barring that opportunity, she runs the risk of fading from view and missing her moment, as Chris Christie did in 2012. Whether or not the president is reelected two years from now with Haley as his running mate, she would naturally emerge as the frontrunner in 2024.

For Trump, too, putting Haley on the ticket makes all the sense in the world.

Many think that in 2020, President Trump is once again likely to face off against a female candidate. Whether it is Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand or, God forbid, Hillary Clinton, his opponent (male or female) will surely attack Mr. Trump for his alleged philandering and supposed mistreatment of women. Nobody could better deflect such accusations than a woman who has worked for the president, and who can speak from personal experience of his support for capable and outspoken females.

Haley is also a minority, the daughter of immigrants from India. Her mother started quite a successful retail business in the U.S. Haley’s experience working in that enterprise informs her pro-business platform, which she shares with Mr. Trump. Her background also allows her to champion intelligent immigration policies, and the benefits this nation derives from people who enter the country legally.

Nikki Haley’s U.N. tenure has received high marks, even from the left-leaning media. The New York Times lamented her resignation in an editorial titled "Nikki Haley Will Be Missed,” mainly because they portray her as a bulwark against what they deem "Mr. Trump’s worst policies and instincts.”

Haley has a formidable resume, more substantial than that of any of the women running on the Democratic side, barring Hillary Clinton whose credentials mainly fall into the voting "present” category, since she accomplished almost nothing during her stint as Secretary of State.

Haley was the first woman and the first minority to serve as governor of South Carolina. She had previously been elected a state legislator, and served as president of the National Association of Women Business Owners.

As governor, Haley was credited with being strong and compassionate as she dealt with a series of crises, including the mass shooting by Dylann Roof at the Emanuel A.M.E. Church in Charleston. She led the citizens of her state in prayer on that occasion, and again in the aftermath of the horrific floods in 2015. The state’s second-largest newspaper said of her response to these crises, "time after time, Gov. Haley did a superior job.” They also noted that "when the nation turned its attention to South Carolina, she presented a smart, calm and confident face...”

[...]

By now you’re probably wondering; what about Mike Pence?

Mike Pence has been a loyal number two in the Trump administration. He has rarely made waves, reliably defended the president in times of turmoil (often, in other words) and has fulfilled the critical role of bolstering the White House’s relationship with the evangelical community. During the 2016 election, the religious right eyed Mr. Trump with understandable skepticism. He had few Republican or conservative credentials, and though he professed to be pro-life was visibly bewildered about what that meant. Moreover, his various scandals and numerous wives caused heartburn amongst evangelicals.

During that race, he needed Mike Pence, a Catholic altar boy in his youth and born-again Christian, to woo the evangelical community. This was an easy assignment, since Pence had long been that group’s pick among presidential candidates. As Richard Land, president of the Southern Evangelical Seminary and a Trump faith advisor told The Atlantic’s McKay Coppins, "Mike Pence is the 24-karat-gold model of what we want in an evangelical politician.”

With the help of Pence, as Coppins points out, Trump won "an astonishing 81 percent of white evangelicals’ votes, more than any Republican presidential candidate on record.” The president’s standing with that community remains high; as Robert Jeffress, pastor of the First Baptist Church in Dallas tweeted on September 2, "The primary reason Evangelicals voted for @POTUS by the widest margin of any candidate in history is because of his commitment to a conservative judiciary, and he's fulfilling that promise beyond anyone's wildest imaginations."

The ascension of Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to the nation’s highest court, along with other measures like moving our embassy to Jerusalem, has cemented Trump’s standing with conservative Christians. But as the president fought to deflect challenges to the Kavanaugh confirmation, he further alienated the #MeToo movement and injured his standing with women.

Approaching 2020, his deficit is with female voters. Knowing that more Supreme Court seats might open up, the Evangelical community is likely to stay on board. Thus, swapping out Mike Pence for Nikki Haley makes all the sense in the world for Trump.

Now he just has to find another job for Mike Pence which would allow him to gracefully step down, and encourage Nikki Haley to sign on. Both those steps will require some artful deal-making, to be sure. But we’ve already seen that the president is capable of doing just that.

 

Works for me. I'm sure that one or another Cabinet posts would be a good fit for Mike Pence and would give him a chance to flex his muscles. Remember, the post of Vice President usually is a pretty boring place where you don't get to do much.

But I think Ms. Peek's right. Haley has been a super-star in the U.N. Post and if she really has any eyes for the White House, giving her the Veep job would be a step in the right direction.


Comments, folks?  Here's the entire story  https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/liz-peek-how-about-trump-haley-in-2020



Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 04:39 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 1021 words, total size 9 kb.

1 I dsdn't care for Haley as Governor. She went along with a lot of left-wing demands (like the statue business) rather than fight for our culture. If there is one thing I've learned it is that you can't be a neocon aka culturally liberal but economically conservative. This is a battle for all the marbles. Haley want4ed to look benign to the media with that. I want a fighter.

And if the New York Times likes her, do we realy think she's on our side?

Oh, and moving Pence out is not a great idea. Pence may well be what has kept Trump on track; he may well start to wander to the Left if Pence is replaced by Haley, who has not shown me her bonafides as a movement conservative. I also don't think it wise to split up a winning team. So he losess a few votes from the meetoo movement? He was never going to get those anyway.

Especially since the Veep is supposed to be the Administration hatchet man (or woman in this case). Haley surely has a role to play, but so much of the talk about her is predicated on her double x chromosome. I think we can and should expect more than that.

I think this Fox essay is still looking at politics through the prism of the old Establishment template. It's not about shuffling the cards with Trump but adding new cards to the deck. This argument presupposes a finite voter base that cares about liberal ideas. In my opinion it is the same thinking that gave us Mitt Romney and John McCain.

She's for open borders, allowing Muslim radicals to immigrate the the U.S., ignoring "angryvoices" aka the voters who aren't happy with the rule of the elites,

Haley may not be a bad idea, but I think there are better ones. Certainly anyone who starts out in the middle of the road will swerve to the left; the world drives like the British after all. Haley likely will be a huge disappointment if given enough opportunity. And her actions at the U.N. reflect her boss, remember that. Ambassadors don't set policy.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at October 23, 2018 08:40 AM (mqZcM)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




29kb generated in CPU 0.0107, elapsed 0.3045 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2969 seconds, 160 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 16490
  • Files: 3016
  • Bytes: 901.6M
  • CPU Time: 29:56
  • Queries: 615573

Content

  • Posts: 28551
  • Comments: 125849

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0