November 09, 2016

Madonna Breaks her Promise

Dana Mathewson

've always said you can't trust liberals!

NY Daily News: Madonna Won’t Honor Promise to Fellate Hillary Voter

Breitbart News


Author Gersh Kuntzman tried to get Madonna to honor her lewd promise to gratify Hillary voters and filmed himself doing so. Read the full story


Jack Kemp replies

LOL. Gersh Kuntzman, the guy who said we shouldn't sing "God Bless America"at major league baseball games. He finally did something that Anthony Weiner didn't have the courage (or the opportunity) to ask for today.

I love it.

They say Missiouri went for Trump and Minnesota is in play! New York went for Hillary (no surprise).


Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 03:58 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 3 kb.

Will Obama Pardon Hillary?

Dana Mathewson

OK, guys, time for some betting. Not saying I have any money for this, but we should at least put some ideas into it. Here we go.

1. Will Zippy pardon Hillary?

2. If so, how soon?

Frankly, I'm not sure about the first, because he really doesn't like her. She can't do him any big favors like carrying on his legacy now. But she can do him some damage. So she does have some leverage over him. And he DID spend some time campaigning for her.

So I'm saying yes, he'll pardon her, and soon -- so as to shut down all talk of a Special Prosecutor, if nothing else.

Your thoughts?

Jack Kemp replies:

Yes, Obama will have to pardon Hillary, even though if he were an illegal, he married an American citizen and can't be deported. And O's father is probably Franklin Marshall Davis, a U.S. born citizen anyway.

He might pardon Hillary late on a Friday night - or at 1 a.m. on January 20, 2017.

Tim replies:

I'm not so sure; Hillary has always been a thorn in O's side, and he might enjoy throwing her under the bus. How best to get her and the STD poster boy out of the way?  Jail would serve nicely...

But then Obama was implicated in the e-mail scandal, and there may be more.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 03:54 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 232 words, total size 2 kb.

One Democrat's Perspective

Dana Mathewson

I haven't been to Lucianne's site in months, so I thought I should check it out today. Don't have a lot of time for the Internet today since I'm still doing the show.

But here's a fun article from Slate by a guy who can read the results and figure them out.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/11/the_democratic_party_establishment_is_finished_after_trump.html

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 03:36 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.

Ding Dong the Witch is Dead

Ding dong, Hillary's gone!

Dong ding, Trump is now King!

Put that in your pipe and smoke it!

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 07:48 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.

November 08, 2016

The Hillary Song

by Timothy Birdnow

This didn't really gel, but I don't have time to mess with it so here it is.

Sung to the tune of Harrigan:

Who is the gal who will spend and will sure offend?
Hillary, that's she!

Are you her friend to the bitter end?
Hillary, that's she!

For she dreams of power and fame you see,
An emperess, czar or a queen she'll be

While her friends take the hammer and wind up in the slammer
Hillary, that's she!

H. I. double L, a, r and Y spells Hillary!
proudly she has looted foreign policy
all our nation's assets are up for a fee
H. I. double L, a, r and Y you see
she's a dame with no shame never has told the truth
she's Hillary, that's she!

Who's the gal married to that big randy lout?
Hillary, that's she!
Who's the gal Donald Trump gets so mad about?
Hillary, that's she!
Feminists with rabies are so fond of her
and even the ladies sexting Tony Weiner
who is the girl who the dishes will hurl?
Hillary, that's she!

H. I. double L, a, r and Y spells Hillary!
proud to crush all those bimbo eruptions
then she'll throw a tantrum or conniption
H. I. double L, a, r and Y you see
Tells her lies with crossed eyes never has told the truth
or had one shred of decency!

Who's the gal who lied about Benghazi, \
arrested some poor schlub just like a Nazi
Hillary, that's she!
Who's the woman that's more evil than Nurse Ratched
in her seizure glasses and her Mao jacket?
Hillary, that's she!

H. I. double L, a, r and Y spells Hillary!
wants to be the first woman as President
she'll bite out throats then glue her teeth with fixodent
H. I. double L, a, r and Y you see
She'll make millions in hard cash
while America will crash
and Colin Kaperneck takes a knee.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:50 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 331 words, total size 2 kb.

Franchise

Timothy Birdnow

I just exercised my franchise in that great American experiment. The wife and I trudged dutifully to the polling place and cast our ballots as good citizens, informed citizens, should.

Here are some impressions.

First, although we went at an off hour (10 a.m.) the turnout was very light. This surprised me a great deal, because I was expecting a packed house. It is a good sign in my opinion because I live in the City of St. Louis, which is a Democrat machine. Light turnout here means fewer votes for The Queen and for the other basket of deplorable liberal soul stealers that are running for office. Light turnout means we have more hope in preventing another one of those nasty Carnahan famiglia members from winning election. It means keeping the corrupt Christ Kostner out. It means hopefully stopping the huge cigarette tax increase that was pushed on not one but two seperate initiatives, one a state constitutional amendment the other a proposition. It means, hopefully, that fewer votes can be stolen.

I was struck by another interesting tidbit; there was a long line at the electronic voting booths, while the paper ballot tables were sparse. I don't get it; the electronic voting has been shown to be open to being hacked, so why would anyone choose that option?  If you want your vote to count it makes no sense to use those George Soros provided gadgets. Go figure.

By the way, you may be reading the work of the next District Attorney in St. Louis!  The Democrats had no opposition for the position, so I wrote myself in. After voting I learned my wife had written me in for that position. So if my opponent gets less than two votes I will be the next Circuit Attorney!  I would have written the wife in except I didn't think she wanted the job...

I've got to get to work on my victory speech for the press.

It's going to be a long night...

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:40 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 337 words, total size 2 kb.

Who's Finger is Safer on the Button?

Timothy Birdnow

A number of the ill-informed, particularly the Millenials, seem to believe that Donald J. Trump is some sort of a crazy man who will push the nuclear button if he gets angry. This appears to be the general opinion of many, who have accepted the Hillary/Media mantra that he is somehow "temperamentally unfit" for office. While it can well be argued that Trump is a bad choice for POTUS, one must question the underlying assumptions of this particular charge.

It's wrong.

First, this is the exact same argument used against Ronald Reagan, who was accused of being a senile fool who would start WWIII one day by pushing the nuclear button while believing it was the coffee maker. This was, of course, absolute nonsense, and Reagan's careful strategy of competing with the Soviets forced them into a retreat that eventually ended their evil reign. How did Reagan do this? He used the strategy the Soviets were using ON US! Until Reagan we had first Containment, which made it American policy to simply stop the Soviets from expanding. (This was the brainchild of a liberal wonk named George Kennan.) Richard Nixon doubled down on this by instituting the policy of his idiot savant Henry Kissinger, a scheme called Detente, which essentially recognized Soviet desires to expand and tried to make it palatable. By taking off the pressure America allowed the Soviets to engage in their own policies toward us, namely, to start a series of brush fires around the world which would exhaust America. Reagan, by instituting a big military buildup and engaging the Soviets wherever they struck, turned the tables on them and they collapsed. Why? Reagan knew they were economically weak, and in a tit-for-tat global struggle they would lose.

Yes, there was a danger some madman would launch the birds on the Asiatic side of the globe, but it was unlikely as most Soviet leaders were interested in survival. Criminals rarely die for a cause since they are more interested in living with ill-gotten gains. Reagan knew that.

So when it is said Trump will blow us up randomly, one must question the historical precedent involved. These same wizards told us Reagan would do that.

Let us ask a question; can Trump actually launch the birds?

Not so easily.

There isn't just a button in the White House the President pushes when he wants to launch the missiles.

The older proceedure entailed a special agent with a briefcase called The Football which contained the nuclear launch codes and a list of targets in a give scenario. The President had to obtain these documents AND enter his own identification code (this is now done electronically and the President must submitt to a retinal scan.) It should be pointed out that former President Bill Clinton LOST THE CARD containing his identification code and it remained lost for several months while he was sodomizing Monica, er, running the country. So, extreme carelessness characterized Bill Clinton as it does Hillary, who leaked all manner of secret information through her home knitted server.

But even then, when the codes go out, the order has to be obeyed and it is entirely possible it will not be.

The Secretary of Defense has to relay the order, and he could well report to Congress instead, invoking the 25th Amendment and removing the President. The protocol further requires that the Speaker of the House, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the heads of all the major committees, etc, be notified prior to launch. They7 can stop the launch if needed. While the system is designed to move quickly there are serious oversights. And there are, of course, many we are not made privvy to, I might add.

It's not just a button. Trump can't just get mad and nuke someone,

And this idea that Trump WOULD get mad and nuke someone is nonsense; a man doesn't wind up with a billion dollar company by acting irresponsibly. How many times has Donald Trump eaten crow for the betterment of Trump Inc.? A hothead is not going to wind up in his position, because he will inevitably cut off his nose to spite his face. Trump has been quite public about some things that are indeed quite childish (like his fights with Rosie O'Donnell) but much of that was calculated to maximize publicity or make a point. To think that Trump would simply fly off the handle is a gross misunderstanding of how billions of dollars are made in real estate in New York.

On the other hand, who has gotten us into war? Hillary. It was her policy to "reset" relations with Russia, which signalled weakness to them and led to the invasion of Ukraine and their subsequent baiting of America across the globe (like their warships cruising off the coast of Australia a while back.) It was Hillary who wanted Assad gone in Syria, something that anyone competent in Russian policy would know was unacceptable. It was Hillary who gave us ISIS by pushing an early withdrawl from Iraq (and she was all for invading Iraq at the beginning) and it was Hillary that gave us Benghazi and put an innocent American citizen in jail for her failure. In one of the debates Hillary called for arming teh Kurds in Iraq - something sure to bring emnity with the Turks. Oh, and she pushed the Iran nuclear deal which guarantees a nuclear bomb to iran if they signed it and furthermore had the U.S. pay them lots of money to invest in the program.

And Hillary has a fierce temper; just ask anyone with close contact with her. She is notorious for throwing things and screaming, and insulting her bodyguards.

No, if anyone is likely to launch the nukes it will be Hillary, who has a deep, enduring, smoldering anger at the world. I would feel much safer with a businessman in charge, who isn't going to risk destroying his corporation rather than someone like Hillary who makes money through selling policy and blackmailing "donors" into coughing up or else.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:10 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 1024 words, total size 6 kb.

ACLU Demands Investigation of Maine Governor for Asking Students to Obey Law

Timothy Birdnow

The Governor of Maine told college students that they should follow state laws regarding residency if they are going to vote in the state. This led to a furious reaction from the ACLU, which is calling for an investigation of Gov. LePage for "voter suppression".

Here is what the Governor said in a press release:


"Democrats for decades have encouraged college students from out of state to vote in Maine, even though there is no way to determine whether these college students also voted in their home states,” the governor said in a statement. "Casting ballots in two different states is voter fraud, which is why Maine law requires anyone voting here to establish residency here.

"We welcome college students establishing residency in our great state, as long as they follow all laws that regulate voting, motor vehicles and taxes. We cannot tolerate voter fraud in our state.”

End excerpt.

And here is the ACLU response:

"The governor’s statement seems designed to make college students afraid to vote,” said Zachary Heiden, the legal director of Maine’s ACLU, which also vociferously opposes voter ID laws. "Voter intimidation and harassment is illegal, and we call on the Department of Justice to investigate the intent of the governor’s comments.”

End excerpt.

This is Obama's/Hillary's America, a land where asking people to obey the law is considered discriminatory or unfair. I must ask; why have a law at all, if it can be circumvented when it is inconvenient? What made America different from the rest of the world (even Europe in the old days) was a strict adherence to the concept of the Rule of Law, which said that the Law trumped the civil authorities. Kings and Emperors make laws, and change them to suit themselves. America was different in that it strictly applied the English concepts put forth in the Magna Carta about the absolute supremacy of law over men. With this as a foundational principle America was able to move on to greatness, because every person knew the rules would not change in the middle of the game. You could count on, say, a rival businessman going to jail if he got insider information, for instance. He couldn't unfairly profit at your expense, no matter how well connected. Similarly, it was understood that there were rules to voting, and that someone couldn't vote more than once. But after over half a century of Progressive tinkering we now have a system where those who stand up for voter integrity are the bad guys and are investigated, while the people who steal the votes and undermine the principle of voting integrity are celebrated as heroes. Remember; this is not a victimless crime. Every stolen vote is stolen from YOU, not some nebulous person. Your vote counts less when someone votes more than once. And real money and power are at stake. Obamacare, for instance, would probably have been overturned and all the money stolen from the American People that has resulted from it's survival depended on Barack Obama winning re-election. He did - and likely through vote fraud in Pennsylvania and elsewhere. So money was stolen FROM YOU as a result of this.

This mocks the Rule of Law. Without the Rule of Law we have the tyranny of men, which is what America is fast becoming.

Progressivism has always been a criminal enterprise. Vote theft is just more proof that it is a cancer.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:25 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 585 words, total size 4 kb.

A Clear Cut Case of Vote Fraud

Timothy Birdnow

A local conservative radio host and televisiion reporter in St. Louis received notice in the mail that he had voted early, when in fact he had yet to vote.

According to Gateway Pundit:

Jamie Allman is the top rated host of Allman in the Morning on 97.1 FM Talk in St. Louis, Missouri.

On Monday Jamie got this letter in the mail from the St. Louis Board of Elections

" @gatewaypundit @971FMTalk Just got notice I voted and I didn't . STLCO Board Of Elections returned my ID: a stolen health insurance card. pic.twitter.com/UptZC9Oncu

— jamieallman (@jallman971) November 8, 2016

End excerpt.

Soooo...

Someone stole Allman's card and cast a fake vote in his name.

The Democrats are pulling out all stops to steal this election.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 07:26 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.

November 07, 2016

Roundup the corrupt fear mongers

Paul Driessen

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is widely used in conjunction with Roundup-Ready seeds, to grow crops that thrive in fields sprayed to eliminate weeds – while also being insect-resistant and drought-tolerant, thanks to other traits built into their DNA. Such crops significantly reduce the need to spray pesticides, irrigate fields or use mechanical cultivating to control weeds. It is a foundation of biotech agriculture and reduced soil erosion.

Now that hundreds of studies, millions of people and trillions of servings with at least one GMO ingredient have proven that GMO products are safe, Greenpeace and other radical anti-technology groups have gone after glyphosate, as their substitute villain. They’ve also enlisted still more collusion, corruption and deceit in the service of what Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore calls their anti-chemical, anti-science, anti-people campaigns.

My article lays it all out. Thank you for posting it, quoting from it, and forwarding it to your friends and colleagues.

Roundup the corrupt fear mongers

Deceit and collusion drive campaigns to ban a vital, popular, safe, affordable herbicide

Paul Driessen

Do we really need more collusion, corruption and deceit in the service of renegade regulators, organic food interests, anti-chemical activists, and policies that carry harmful or even lethal consequences?

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is one of the most widely used herbicides on Earth. Numerous farmers use it in conjunction with Roundup-Ready seeds, to grow crops that thrive in fields sprayed to eliminate weeds – while also being insect-resistant and drought-tolerant, thanks to other traits built into their DNA. Such crops significantly reduce the need to spray pesticides and irrigate fields.

They also permit no-till farming, which eliminates mechanical weeding, thereby greatly reducing erosion and enabling soils to retain their stores of carbon, carbon dioxide and other nutrients.

Glyphosate is also better, safer and less expensive than "organic” alternatives. On a volume basis, it is much less toxic than salt or vinegar, which are often combined for homemade weed killers. Farmers also have to use far more salt-vinegar concoctions and apply them more often than they would glyphosate, and even then the S-V mix is not nearly as effective. Industrial-strength organic herbicides also exist.

However, when ultra-green Sonoma County, California tried one of these "natural alternatives” to glyphosate, the "organic” product cost 17 times more than Monsanto’s oft-vilified chemical to cover the same acreage. Moreover, sprayers had to use hazmat suits and respirators when applying the natural chemical mix, because it irritated eyes and nasal passages. Glyphosate/ Roundup requires no protective gear. The "organic” mixture is also toxic to bees and other beneficial insects; Roundup is not.

These hard realities force many organic farms to rely on mechanized or hand weeding. But tractors crush closely planted crops, and even full-sized hoes don’t offer enough control to avoid damaging sensitive plants. That means poorly paid migrant farm workers must bend over all day, using short-handled hoes. So California banned the little hoes, and then banned "unnecessary hand weeding” since it also causes serious to permanent back problems – but exempted organic farms from the ban.

With people having safely eaten trillions of servings containing one or more GMO ingredients, and hundreds of scientific organizations having determined that genetically modified foods are perfectly safe, radical anti-technology groups like Greenpeace have increasingly focused on glyphosate as their substitute villain. They’ve also enlisted a number of regulatory agencies, by helping to get anti-chemical activists in their ranks and launching high-pressure campaigns to secure desired agency decisions.

Among them is the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a World Health Organization (WHO) bureau headquartered in France. IARC simply reviews existing research and classifies chemicals as definitely, probably, possibly or not likely to cause cancer in humans at extremely high doses. It does not conduct its own studies or determine which exposure levels do not actually pose cancer risks.

Considering that coffee, alcohol, salted fish, and many nutritious fruits and vegetables are carcinogenic in high doses, this is not a very useful approach. In fact, since 1965, IARC has reviewed over 900 chemicals and concluded that only one is "probably not carcinogenic to humans.”

All too often, IARC uses its classifications to justify chemical bans, without considering other factors. As a 2016 Toxicology and Pharmacology journal paper by ten US and EU toxicology and cancer experts demonstrates, this methodology is outmoded, unworkable and likely to reach erroneous conclusions. Even worse, IARC is now controlled by anti-chemical activists who have multiple conflicts of interest and often collude with other activists in regulatory agencies and extreme environmentalist groups.

What is really needed, these experts emphasize, is "risk assessment,” which requires evaluating human exposure to a chemical in terms of its avenue (topical, inhalation or ingestion) and the duration, frequency and magnitude of exposure, to assess maximum safe doses. Evaluations must also determine whether substances that cause cancer in animals also do so in humans. For instance, statins and many other pharmaceuticals are carcinogenic for animals, but safe for humans. Only after all this is done can proper risk management and mitigation measures be developed. However, IARC does none of this.

The IARC hazard-identification method can lead to crazy results. For instance, it puts processed meat in the same "definitely carcinogenic” category as poisonous mustard gas. The paper’s authors ask: Should we treat processed meats the same way we do mustard gas: reduce exposure to zero? Or should we treat mustard gas the way we handle red or processed meat: as part of a healthy lifestyle, in moderation?

Addressing these and other considerations, the European Food Safety Authority recently concluded that glyphosate "is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans.” IARC labeled glyphosate "a probable human carcinogen” and vigorously lobbied Brussels officials for a ban, threatening its approval in the EU.

This unprecedented political activism raises serious questions about collusion, dishonesty and lack of transparency at the IARC, US Environmental Protection Agency and NIH’s National Institutes of Environmental Health, which is led by anti-chemical activist Linda Birnbaum. University of Illinois emeritus professor Bruce Chassy, risk evaluation blogger David Zaruk, the US House of Representatives Oversight Committee, the Reuters News Agency and others have documented all of this, and more:

IARC cherry-picked both the studies it relied on, and data from within those studies, to support conclusions sought by activists like former NIEH staffer Chris Portier. He drove the IARC review process, influenced who would be on its evaluation panels, and campaigned across Europe for a ban – while receiving paychecks from the anti-pesticide pressure group Environmental Defense Fund. IARC hid those connections and failed to disclose similar conflicts of interest by other review panel members.

Now IARC is refusing to release data and documents used in reaching its conclusions and advising panelists not to disclose materials requested under FOIA. It claims IARC is the "sole owner” of all such materials, even though they were developed using US and EU tax money, and peer review by independent outside experts is essential for ensuring honest, accurate, scientific decisions that serve the public interest.

Meanwhile, IARC insists that its practices are "widely respected for their scientific rigor, standardized and transparent process and freedom from conflicts of interest.” You cannot make this stuff up.

Meanwhile, EPA has again delayed its final decision on glyphosate safety, removed a supportive memo from its website, and given contradictory and deceptive testimony on the issue to Congress. House Science, Space and Technology Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) has sent a letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, demanding explanations and corrections.

One question involves the relationship between EPA and Chris Portier’s brother Ken, who was recently added to EPA’s Scientific Advisory Panel on glyphosate. The two served on multiple NIEH and EPA panels and meetings, without disclosing their relationship, even when Ken reviewed Chris’s work.

The National Institutes of Health has given tens of millions of dollars to IARC. And yet, when the House Oversight Committee questioned its officials about glyphosate decisions and ties to EPA, NIH agreed to appear only if any hearing was off limits to the press and public. What are the agencies trying to hide?

Worst of all, this war on GMO food and glyphosate has lethal consequences. As former UK Environment Secretary Owen Paterson has noted, Vitamin A Deficiency causes 500,000 children to go blind and half of them to die every year. VAD also causes nutritionally acquired immune deficiency syndrome, which results in another two million children dying annually from diseases they would otherwise survive. Nutrient-fortified "Golden Rice” could prevent VAD – but Greenpeace and other radicals oppose its use.

That means their 15-years-long war on Golden Rice alone has killed 30 million children. Tens of millions more have died because the same extremist groups oppose DDT, other pesticides and fossil fuels. They are more worried about far-fetched risks from glyphosate and GMO foods than about this death toll. That is outrageous. This eco-manslaughter, this crime against humanity, can no longer be tolerated.

We need to use Roundup on the corruption, collusion, cronyism and callous disregard for human lives.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org), and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power - Black death and other books on the environment.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:54 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 1540 words, total size 11 kb.

Dutch Using Eagles to Capture Illegal Drones

Jack Kemp

The Dutch police are using bald eagles, amongst others.

http://thehackernews.com/2016/02/police-eagle-drone-hunting.html

The Dutch National Police force is training eagles to take down rogue drones, instead of shooting them, using radio jammers, net-wielding interceptor drones or anti-drone rifle.

We already know the role Sniffer Dogs play for Anti-Bomb squads in detecting hidden bombs and weapons.

If dogs can be trained, so can eagles. Keeping this in mind, it is the first time any police authority has trained eagles to safely bring down bad quadcopters in emergency cases.

Dutch police reportedly collaborated with a raptor training company called 'Guard From Above', to train eagles to recognise drones and then snatch it with its talons.

See video of the birds in action - with explanation in Dutch at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HifO-ebmE1s

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:46 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 134 words, total size 1 kb.

Hillary had Maid Print Classified Docs

Jack Kemp

Here is a part of today's NY Post cover story by Paul Sperry.


http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/
Clinton directed her maid to print out classified materials
As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.
In fact, Marina Santos was called on so frequently to receive e-mails that she may hold the secrets to E-mailgate — if only the FBI and Congress would subpoena her and the equipment she used.
Clinton entrusted far more than the care of her DC residence, known as Whitehaven, to Santos. She expected the Filipino immigrant to handle state secrets, further opening the Democratic presidential nominee to criticism that she played fast and loose with national security.
Clinton would first receive highly sensitive e-mails from top aides at the State Department and then request that they, in turn, forward the messages and any attached documents to Santos to print out for her at the home.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:41 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.

Janet Reno RIP

Dana Mathewson

Why wasn't she in prison at the time?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/07/former-us-attorney-general-janet-reno-dies-at-78.html

Janet Reno, the first woman to serve as U.S. attorney general and the epicenter of several political storms during the Clinton administration, has died. She was 78.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:38 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.

Dem Vote Tampering in Ohio

Dana Mathewson

No comment needed.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/06/ohio-official-extremely-questionable-if-not-illegal-behavior-outside-polling-station.html



Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:22 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.

Voting Across the Aisle

Helen Dyer forwards this astute observation:

"I don't always vote Democratic, but when I do, it's because I'm dead and someone's using my name."

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:20 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.

Comey Closes the Investigation; Red Herring to Help Hillary

Timothy Birdnow

When James Comey, FBI director and supposedly straight arrow, announced Hillary Clinton was not prosecutable we all knew it was horsepoop; intent had nothing to do with the crimes for which she was accused. But it was clear Comey was compromised, and his reputation in tatters. So when he reopened the investigvation into Mrs. Clinton we all thought that perhaps he had a change of heart, decided a reputation was better than whatever he was getting (or not getting) from the Clinton and Obama syndicate.

But there were those of us who had doubts. Rush Limbaugh, who would not actually admit HE had doubts, explained the doubter side; Comey reopened the investigation to turn attention away from the Wikileaks e-mails, which were starting to have a real impact on the Clinton campaign. He explained that, if this is true, Comey would largely close the investigation a day or two before the election "exhonerating" Mrs. Clinton.

I didn't think that would be the case; it was too damaging to Hillary. That would only be a measure of last resort, in my opinion.

Seems I was wrong. Comey just closed the investigation down or at least told Congress there is nothing to see here.

This was exactly what Limbaugh said would happen if the fix was in. I have little doubt that was precisely the case.

The investigation of the Clinton Foundation will continue, but how likely is it that it will go anywhere if Hillary is President? Richard Nixon couldn't pull that sort of thing off, but that was then, in a more moral and legal era. Hillary will be able to stop any investigation from touching her, and Congress will not have the courage to impeach the first woman president.

She must be stopped tomorrow.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:11 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 306 words, total size 2 kb.

November 06, 2016

Prematue Coup Against trump

Timothy Birdnow

Nate Silver, polling guru and object of worship for the Left, has gotten into a knock-down, drag-out fight with an idiot named Ryan Grim at the Huffington Post who took umbrage with Silver's prediction of a close race.

First, Grim made the following complaint

"By monkeying around with the numbers like this, Silver is making a mockery of the very forecasting industry that he popularized,”

"I get why Silver wants to hedge. It’s not easy to sit here and tell you that Clinton has a 98 percent chance of winning. Everything inside us screams out that life is too full of uncertainty, that being so sure is just a fantasy. But that’s what the numbers say. What is the point of all the data entry, all the math, all the modeling, if when the moment of truth comes we throw our hands up and say, hey, anything can happen. If that’s how we feel, let’s scrap the entire political forecasting industry.

Silver’s guess that the race is up for grabs might be a completely reasonable assertion ― but it’s the stuff of punditry, not mathematical forecasting. about Silver's methodology"

End excerpt.

Silver gives Trump a 35.2% chance of winning the election. The Huffpo - and this crazy Ryan Grim - give Trump 2%.

Based on what? Anyone who bothers to look at the methodology of these "Hillary landslide" polls knows Democrats are being way oversampled; most polls are using turnout numbers from 2008, which was a completely different election. The fact is, Hillary is disliked by her own party, and many Bernie supporters aren't going to show at the polls. Trump is disliked by his party's elites, but his supporters are far more enthusiastic, and Trump clearly has a solid chance of winning in many of the necessary battleground states. Only a fool would call this for Hillary this early.

And Silver agrees:

" The reason we adjust polls for the national trend is because **that’s what works best emperically**. It’s not a subjective assumption.

— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 5, 2016

It’s wrong to show Clinton with a 6-point lead (as per HuffPo) when **almost no national poll shows that**. Doesn’t reflect the data.

— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 5, 2016

Every model makes assumptions but we actually test ours based on the evidence. Some of the other models are barley even empirical.

— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 5, 2016

That's what makes a model a useful scientific & journalistic tool. It's a way to understand how elections work. Not just about the results.

— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 5, 2016

The problem is that we're doing this in a world where people—like @ryangrim—don't actually give a shit about evidence and proof.

— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 5, 2016



End excerpts.

So one must ask why this Huffpo fellow is so exercised with Silver, who, contrary to this fellow's assertion, has no love for Donald Trump. Why is this guy so mad?

Because the Left is trying to set the stage for a political coup if Trump wins. They are going to argue that the Trump campaign, in association with the Russians, stole the election. They are trumpeting teh polls - and the polls have been all over the map - to not just disspirit the GOP but to make the case that the election is already over.

Doubt me? Wikileaks showed that this was in fact the Clinton strategy:



And Democrat pollster Pat Caddell also pointed out an unprecedented bias in the polls for Clinton.

What people like Grim and the Huffpo crowd are doing is setting the table to challenge Trump's validity as President if he wins. This is one of the dirtiest tricks I've seen from the Left, and I've seen many dirty tricks from them over the years. It's an attempted premature coup.



Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:10 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 644 words, total size 5 kb.

Obama Calls for Illegal Aliens to Vote

Timothy Birdnow

Barack Obama openly calls for illegal aliens to tamper with the U.S. Presidential election and promises no repercussions.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/criminal-president-obama-encourages-illegal-aliens-vote-promises-no-repercussions-video/

Obama and Hillary should share a cell in Marion...

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 07:24 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.

NYPD May Grab Weiner

Dana Maathewson

Some real raw, red meat here!

Erik Prince: NYPD Ready to Make Arrests in Anthony Weiner Case
Breitbart News

Blackwater founder and retired Navy SEAL Erik told Breitbart News Daily on SiriusXM that according to one of his "well-placed sources" in the New York Police Department, "the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making" in the Anthony Weiner investigation, but received "huge pushback" from the Justice Department

http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/04/erik-prince-nypd-ready-make-arrests-weiner-case/

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 06:43 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.

Hillary's Selfie Pardon

Dana Mathewson

That's as may be, but if it were to happen I think the reaction would be horrendous and she'd effectively be prevented from governing.

Prof. Banzhaf: Nothing Prevents Hillary Clinton from Pardoning Herself After Inauguration
Breitbart News

Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University Law School John Banzhaf talked with Breitbart News Daily SiriusXM host Alex Marlow on Friday about complications that would emerge if Hillary Clinton pardoned herself after inauguration if she were elected president

http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/04/prof-banzhaf-nothing-prevents-hillary-pardoning-inauguration/

Hat tip to Jack Kemp for the title.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 06:41 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.

<< Page 6 of 8 >>
521kb generated in CPU 0.0545, elapsed 0.2365 seconds.
53 queries taking 0.188 seconds, 215 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy



Categories

Archives

 
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+ Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 79511
  • Files: 12828
  • Bytes: 3.8G
  • CPU Time: 268:27
  • Queries: 2885826

Content

  • Posts: 28625
  • Comments: 126608

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0