More Bidenomics. Your tax dollars going to Mexican hip-hop artists …

w.

Department of State grant (2021)
Amount: $28,200
Recipient: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Purpose: Implement the virtual hip hop professional development residency Next Level Mexico online for about 125 aspiring hip hop artists in Mexico
Country: Mexico

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan "What a 15 Minute City actually is, it is something that the WEF has created called C40, and it's called C40 cities”

"You won't be able to drive a petrol or diesel car anymore. You'll have to buy electric. If you want food, you will get a calorie-control led system sent to you by text saying this is what you can eat today, this is what you can have today. If you violate any of these things, they will freeze your bank account. That is the next step.”

"These are stages in which they're going to implement this stuff. And this was signed up by the WEF and the WEF has signed up with our mayor in London as the chair and he has gone around the world to communicate this C402. All of the countries in the world and most of the countries are looking at adopting it”

"We are going to be in an open prison”

1. O.J. Simpson
2. George Floyd
3. Covid 19
4. Biden

Four events that combined to set USA back by 100 years.

We are now where we were in 1924, not where we should be in 2024.

The instant Simpson was found "not guilty" galvanized USA along racial lines. He got very good trial counsel and the jury was careless, and deceived (if the glove don't fit you must acquit --- really a very stupid jury).

George Floyd was going for his gun, which was found, just where he was seeking. The police were dealing with a big strong willful man who wanted to kill them. They used force as people who are scared do --- too much --- and they killed Floyd by mistake. They did not know he was hopped up on drugs, The drugs played a major role in his death. A person not on drugs would not have died under the same police treatment.

George did, so cities all over USA were on fire, and some declared themselves to be special nations. This was a huge setback. We have not recovered from it.

Covid-19 was mishandled, except in Florida where it was handled right. It caused Biden to be elected. It made the election into a ballot hustle. The Dems knew how to do ballot hustles. The GOP was not skilled in that area.

Biden had his open border, his Bidenomics, his freak show of appointees, his own display of an imbecile trying to talk or walk.

We have had four events that together set us back 100 years.

We will pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and go back to using liberty, and competition, and freedom to excel.

For the first time in our history, a 30-year-olds aren’t doing as well as his or her parents were at 30. That is the social compact breaking down.

People aged 30-34, 60% of them in 1990 had one child. Now it's 27%. People are opting out of America, they're not optimistic about it, they're not having kids.

Young people aren't having sex. They're not meeting, they're not mating. The pool of emotionally and economically viable men shrinks every day. Which lessens household formation.

The country young people are inheriting is NOT the same country the previous generations were given by their forefathers who built up America. America now is a different place than it was 40 years ago.

Millennials and Gen Z look up, they see wealth, exceptional wealth, across my generation and people in certain industries, and they are really struggling. Their purchasing power is really going down.

The value of college degrees is devalued with too many people are going to college, not too few.

Housing permits are sequestered from young people, housing prices have gone from 290 to 420 in the last 4 years.

Timothy Birdnow

The human brain is an amazing thing, but it is built, not born. Neuroplasticity means we create neural pathways based on what we do and how we think. We now have a generation of young people who have never been long absent from their electronic communications. Their brains are wired to be part of a collective now.

And by acquiescing to this the older generation has created a group that is extraordinarily vulnerable to control; they are lost without the gadgets to make them part of the Borg Collective. They believe what they see online and ONLY that.

In short, we are making slaves, slaves who prefer their bondage to the vicissitudes of freedom.

Like the Israelites who feared leaving Egypt, they fear leaving the electronic plantation. It feels horribly unnatural to them. They cannot function precisely because they have not made the neural pathways for social intercourse and to actually live as real people. Their brains can grow these but it will be a difficult, painful effort.

I fear for them should something take out the internet; they would be like people suddenly blinded. But it may well be the most important thing we can do to stop the drive to the cliff-edge of our civilization.

The computer is a seeming good but in fact a terrible trap, I fear, for young minds. Everyone is worried about AI taking over, but I think it has already taken over the young. This is a form of mind control.

As the novel 1984 observed, in the end "he loved Big Brother". That is what computer technology is doing; making us love our jailers.

Human beings are made to think, reason, plan. Computers take much of that away and give it to machines - and to those who program the machines and run the information nexus.

Human beings are not supposed to exist in an alternate reality. But that is where we are at now. It is no coincidence we are seeing the rise of truly insane ideas like transgenderism now; our young live in a dream world of zeroes and ones and colorful screens with flashing lights and dancing images. They do not read, except where it is required along with their photos and videos and music. They do not learn to discipline their minds. They do not learn anything outside of what is online. They do not come to understand the complexities of life (which was learned through the arts and humanities in the past.) They live rather in an artificial reality and so they believe artificial things.

They believe in transgenderism, in socialism, in all sorts of easily disproven concepts. Why not? Reality doesn't really exist in their worlds.

This had been coming for a long time, well before computers, but it has metastasized with the machines.

The Book of Revelation says the False Prophet will create an "image" of the Beast and all will worship him. What does that mean? Is the image of the Beast what the young see on their computers? Certainly the term Beast could be applied to the leviathan nature of the internet, to the multiple tendrils that curl around all aspects of our society. It is much like the hydra, which just grew new heads when they were cut off in battle.

The internet is a beast even if it is not THE Beast.

So young people have plugged their brains into this new electronic god. And committed their souls to the void of zeroes and ones pulsing about the planet.

The God of our fathers has been replaced by a cheap usurper. And this god isn't full of forgiveness as is Yahweh. On the contrary if a young person bucks the system he or she will be destroyed by those who they once thought of as friends. There are ample stories about young people cast out by the woke mob online. And there are stories about young people committing suicide over cyber bullying and the like. If nothing else there is little in the way of hope offered to anyone via the internet. It is full of judgment and demands.

But of course you can't just pull kids off-line; the schools require they work on the computer. We've made it mandatory for our society. Take a kid permanently off-line and you are condemning him or her to failure and irrelevancy, and probably taking away what passes for friends. No parent wants to do that.

But the price is the kids' souls. And our country's survival.

The computer is a very useful tool in the hands of a mature and, well, just plain wise person. It is a danger to those who are not. Much like fire, or a knife, it is a menace in the hands of children. And yet they are better at using it than are the older folks who actually have the capacity to use it properly. It is, in fact, that very capacity - the unwillingness to become one with the machine - that makes the older generation less capable at using the machine. The young merge with it. Well, there is a terrible price to be paid for that. Loneliness, social isolation, intellectual stultification, an inability to experience pleasure without the machine, short attention spans, etc. are all the "gifts" of the electronic Beast.

The same was true of television when it became ubiquitous. Parents used it as a babysitter. But it is not as interactive, as powerful at getting at the core of the person. You had to take what programming was offered with t.v. You were passive, absorbing things like sponges, but that limited it's power to a degree; much of the brainwashing failed due to boredom with the content. Now we have the power of the media to manipulate thoughts and emotions and beliefs with the ability to entertain at all times. The youths are eternally engaged. But they are engaged with the Devil.

Dance with the Devil and you'll do it in Hell.

I think the computer culture must die if we are to have any hope of saving or restoring our culture. It is the stealer of souls.

Concern with Climate Change rests on the assumption that increased atmospheric CO2, presumably from human activity, will cause increased heat retention in the atmosphere, leading to potentially dangerous over-heating of the planet.

The principle is pretty stratightforwar d. Incoming radiant energy from the sun, consisting of infrared, visible, and ultraviolet wavelengths, strikes the surface, warming it. Some of the heat is transferred directly to the atmosphere by contact, but much of it is re-emitted as long-wavelength infrared, abbreviated OLR for "outgoing long-wavelength radiation." Unimpeded, OLR would head straight to space.

But atmospheric gases, including CO2, absorb and re-emit, in all directions, some amount of this energy, which would otherwise escape directly to space. Basically its like a faint secondary reflection, which transmits some amount of radiant energy back toward the surface, heating it by some amount. More CO2 means more energy captured and re-radiated by the atmosphere, meaning more heating of the surface and atmosphere, or so goes the thinking.

But the energies involved are fairly small. The IPCC estimates that increasing from 280-ish ppm of CO2 to 420-ish has added the equivalent of 2.5 Watts of radiant energy for every square meter of surface.

To put that in context, the clear-sky summer sun at noon delivers about 1400 Watts per square meter of radiant energy, while the whole-earth, 24/7 average is about 342 W m^2.

So if this figure is accurate, then the additional CO2 has increased the radiant energy reaching the surface, on average, by only about 0.7 percent. energetically speaking, that's the difference between having a chicken salad sandwich for lunch and having that same sandwich plus about a quarter of a potato chip.

OK, so maybe it's not really a problem right now. But if you add more CO2, this smallish value will become a much larger one, right?

Maybe, maybe not. Let's take a closer look.

The "absorption spectrum" of CO2, meaning the wavelengths it absorbs and re-emits, is pretty patchy. The gas absorbs very strongly in only one narrow band centered on about the 1500 nanometer wavelength, pretty close to the center of the OLR spectrum. Water vapor, which is very abundant throughout most of the lower atmosphere, also absorbs in this wavelength, though not as efficiently as CO2.

CO2 absorbs this wavelength so strongly that it is effectively blocked, even at very low concentrations.

This leads to sharply diminishing returns. At 50 ppm CO2 is capturing maybe 80 percent of the 1500 nm band, at 100 ppm a few percent more, at 200 ppm a couple percent more, and so on. By the time you get to 400 ppm, more than 90 percent of the OLR that can be captured, is. If you double it again to 800 ppm you capture just a couple percent more bit of the available energy. Full saturation, meaning essentially 100 percent capture, occurs around 4000 ppm.

This principle is central to the issue of climate change, because at this point CO2 has pretty much reached its limit as a driver of climate change. Any increase of CO2 in the atmosphere will add only a tiny bit of additional heat to the atmosphere.

This knowledge, widespread in the field of atmospheric science, has pretty much been unknown to the general public, and ignored by those pushing climate alarm for fun or profit, mostly profit. For good reason. Because a LOT of money is on the line, not to mention careers and reputations. And what would the media do to grab eyeballs if it lost one of its favorite Narratives?

Climate Change is now a multi- multi- billion dollar international business. Goldman-Freakin g-Sachs for crying out loud is sinking billions into it. With so much money on the line, any contrary truth is going to be ruthlessly suppressed. And that's exactly what has happened for the last couple decades.

But the walls are starting to crack. Here and there scientific publications that still have some integrity have published original research that verifies this principle, first established by Happer and Wiijngarden some years ago.

how-co2s-capacity-to-absorb-radiation-has-saturated/3 Physicists Use Experimental Evidence To Show CO2’s Capacity To Absorb Radiation Has Saturated
notrickszone.com