From the vast right-wing conspiracy to the vast Russian conspiracy — Hillary Clinton has journeyed a long way in her tinfoil hat over the last 20 years, and the road has been all downhill.

And now the failed kleptocrat is all in on the blame game, naming names, throwing everybody under the bus, especially liberal females.

And the most delicious part is that the accused Russkie assets are firing back.

Take it away, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-HI.

"Great! Thank you, @Hillary Clinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.”

I wish I’d written that last sentence. It is a perfect summation of Hillary’s 72 squalid years on the planet.

She was on a podcast with an Obama stooge named David Plouffe when suddenly she began ranting about the perfidious Russians, or Republicans, or somebody. She went full Joe McCarthy. The only thing missing was her waving around a list with a bunch of names of "known Communists” on it.

"They’re going to do third-party again,” Hillary hissed. "I’m not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic Party and are grooming her to be their third-party candidate.”

Grooming her? You mean, like Bill Clinton… groomed Monica Lewinsky?

"She’s a favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far. That’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she is also a Russian asset.”

Jill Stein a Russian asset? The Green Party presidential candidate in 2016 led the "recount” effort after the election. Granted, the attempt was kinda half-hearted, except for the fundraising piece. But still, Stein spearheaded the left’s first attempt to derail Donald Trump, even before the faithless electors, the emoluments clause, the Logan Act, the 25th amendment, the Russia hoax, the Ukraine hoax …

Now, though, Jill Stein, the Betsy Ross, the Rosa Parks of the Resistance, is a "Russian asset.”

[...]

Tulsi, though, was even more thoroughly slimed. She’s hanging in on the presidential field by a fingernail, at 2 percent or less in most polls. Yet right before the CNN debate last week in Ohio, the New York Times ran what Tulsi described as a "Greatest Hits” smear piece on her, describing her as "a potentially useful vector for Russian efforts to sow division within the Democratic party.”

In her response tweets, Tulsi went straight at Hillary:

"From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a concerted campaign to destroy my reputation. We wondered who was behind it and why. Now we know – it was always you, through your proxies and powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine afraid of the threat I pose.”

Remember, Hillary is the one who signed off on selling Russian-connected parties 20% of the US uranium supply, after which the Clinton Foundation got more than $100 million in "donations” and Bill pocketed $500,000 cash for speeches to Moscow banks controlled by Putin-allied oligarchs.

Why would the Russians have ever supported Donald Trump when they already knew that they could, uh, do business with the Clintons? They say Vladimir Putin is a gangster, and he probably is, so let me ask you: since when do gangsters want to replace crooked cops they’ve already bribed, and therefore own?

Why take a chance with a potentially honest new cop on the beat?

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at October 21, 2019 10:52 AM (FgUWJ)

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at October 21, 2019 12:10 PM (7dO9x)

Hide Comments | Add Comment