What Democrats have done to Trump must be done to Biden. There is no choice.

The keyword is "ruthless”.

When the Mueller report hit the ground and as Trump was impeached - twice - I said there was no evidence because there was literally no evidence.

In both impeachments, as well as the Mueller "investigation" , the "evidence" was actually based on opinions about stuff the Dems didn't like. People like Adam Schiff spent the entire four years trying to reinvent things Trump did that Obama, Bush and Clinton had done, as crimes. They chose to interpret actions taken by the President as criminal or "high crimes and misdemeanors" to suit their need of the moment.

As a sidebar, I'm aware of someone (whom I know well), who is the plaintiff in a breach of contract case and the defendants, her former employers have literally taken her job responsibilitie s and actions and tried to turn them into bad acts. For example, they vested the responsibility in her to negotiate a deal and now they are claiming all sorts of improper actions when she was just doing what they asked her to do.

It's not going anywhere because it is a farce - they are doing this to her to try to run up her legal bills and force her to give up.

That was - and is - the strategy regarding President Trump.

When they say "there is no evidence" in regard to Slow Joe, what they mean is there is evidence, just none they are willing to accept, so the plan to ignore it until they can't.

Greg Abbot and Ron DeSantis, in a true Alinsky move (make your enemy live up to his own rules), changed the discussions about illegal immigration forever when they sent illegal aliens north for the Sanctuary City crowd to enjoy. We all see how few illegals it took to expose these people for the frauds they have always been.

That's what has to happen with Biden.

Harry Reid, Schumer, Obama, Biden and people like Adam Schiff, Sheldon Whitehouse and Fang Dang Swalwell made these new rules, now Biden needs to be forced to live by them.

Tim adds:

1 Thank you for shedding light on the need for fairness and consistency in politics. It's clear that applying the same standards to all political figures, irrespective of party affiliation, is crucial for justice and fairness. Let's remember that equal treatment is essential to rebuild trust and uphold the rule of law. | Please click here for more info about our services for bathroom remodel services near you, or hair removal services.

2 Lucie I agree; we need one rule applied to all. That is the only way anyone can say we have a free  society. Sadly there are now two different rules and those on the side of the People are treated far differently than the elites.

3 Assuming we have the power in both houses of the legislature, yes, we must do this, even though it may be morally repugnant. But yes; "Fight fire with fire." And may the fire burn hotter on our side, if possible.

4 Dana I think we need to at least impeach Biden, even if the Dems hold the Senate. It's the only way the information will get out. The media will simply suppress it as they usually do otherwise.

Conviction would be the cherry on top.

It's a shame it has to come to this but the aggressor sets the rules of engagement, and this is where they have taken us.

I heard an idiot Republican (most of that breed, alas) say we can't do that because then it will lead to escalation!  Talk about being in denial!  I was reminded of Saddam Hussein's information minister who said they had driven the Americans out of the country as the sound of hand-to hand fighting could be heard.

Yeah; it's kid of like that.

Thanks to the vaccine mandates and push to vaccinate Americans from infants to the elderly, Fauci is worth over $12.6 mil from royalties from big pharma while he was a government employee.

He and his wife have a substantial investment portfolio, although there was some controversy surrounding some of the investments. One particular questionable investment is in Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund. The fund is run by California-base d Matthews Asia, which has up to 42% of the fund trading in "China/Hong Kong" stocks. In addition, there were some questions about any financial benefits that could derive from the COVID pandemic.

But did Dr Fauci's net worth significantly increase during the COVID-19 pandemic?

What was Fauci's net worth before the COVID-19 pandemic?

Dr. Fauci and his wife, Christine Grady, enjoyed over a two-fold increase in net worth during the COVID pandemic crisis. From the beginning of the crisis in 2019 to 2021, their net worth doubled and grew from $5 million to over $12.6 million.

Pre-COVID pandemic, Fauci's net worth in 2019 was approximately $7.5 million. However, after two years into the COVID pandemic, his net worth increased to slightly more than $12.6 million.

What are the sources of income for Fauci's in 2021- 2022?

The Fauci's have multiple income streams, including being a federal employee for 55 years. Among the sources of income for Dr.Fauci and his wife, Christine Grady, for 2022 are:

Whitehouse Chief Medical Advisor - In his role as President Biden's Chief Medical Advisor, Dr. Fauci has a higher salary than the president at $480,000.

Christine Grady - Her work at the Clinical Centre at NIH (National Institutes of Health) pays $238,970 annually.

NIH and NIAID Pharmaceutical Royalty Payments - In 2021, Dr. Fauci received 23 royalty payments from pharmaceutical companies through his association with NIAID, worth $456,028.

Dr. Fauci Gifts and Awards - Dr. Fauci received awards and gifts from international non-profit organizations totaling nearly $1 million, including a $901,400 "gift" from the Israel-based Dan David Foundation.

1   Good article and explanation. online sabong philippines

There is no evidence

Only, >>ICYMI: Only 1 official ballot paper type was approved in Maricopa County AZ for all 2020 election counted ballots, yet 10 types were discovered by voter-volunteer s amounting to over 200,000 ‘non-conforming ’ ballots that were all counted in a race Joe Biden ‘won’ by far far less.<< (Rasmussen Report)

No evidence. None at all. President Bribem is a honourable man.

1 President Bribe-e'm? Priceless!

2 Thank you very much for sharing such a useful article. Will definitely saved and revisit your site
esabong events

1 I Like!! Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.
online sabong

1 Hi just want say that this article is very nice and very informative article.I will make sure to be reading your blog more.
e sabong

1

I really appreciate this wonderful post that you have provided for us. I assure this would be beneficial for most of the people. Smm Panel

2 Supporting humanitarian efforts in Ukraine is vital, and initiatives like the CGI Ukraine Action Network are promising. Transparency and efficient management are key to ensuring aid reaches those in need. Collaboration between Hillary Clinton and Olena Zelenska is a positive step. Let's hope these efforts bring meaningful help to Ukraine. | Please click here for more info about our removal services.

3 Lucie I disagree; nothing positive will come from the Clinton Foundation. It  isn't really a charity but a slush fund.

Still don’t have the Epstein client list.

Still have major Democrat politicians with a curious taste in ‘pedo erotica’ art.

Still have Hunter Biden walking free.

Still have child sex trafficking across an open border.

Still have a US President whose grim advances his own daughter was terrified of.

Still have a woman who accused that President of rape forced to flee to Russia.

Still have tens of thousands of kids go missing every year.

Still have powerful pedo networks doing whatever they please.

Still have it pretty much established that intelligence services like getting politicians involved in child abuse so they have leverage on them (Epstein was an asset).

But hey, look here-every single time someone starts questioning things and has a big following, we get a MSM sex scandal and abuse accusation (Russell Brand).

Weird how that works, isn’t it?

1 Thanks, great article
flower delivery Germany

2 Yeah, it's very interesting how it all works. Of course, it's probably coincidental (and I've got a bridge in New York to sell you on the strength of that...).

Bidenomics should be called Ponzinomics instead.

US Treasury interest servicing costs have started to rise dramatically… increasing by roughly $10 billion every month…

At current interest rates, we are heading towards $1 trillion per year… the beginning of a vicious debt interest spiral.

YTD 2023, taxpayers have spent $800 bil in interest payments on our debt.

This will probably not surprise anyone and many may not like my position on the issue. I don't find anything out of order with women being of lower participation in management in the corporations and government.

As an executive who managed both men and women, women overwhelmingly were unwilling to put in what men did for their jobs. Women employees always wanted more money, but stated and demonstrated that they didn't want to apply for the jobs that paid more because they didn't want to put in the overtime, the continuing education, the certifications and in some cases the licenses required for those positions. The commitment required.

I still meet young women workers today that tell me that they don't want to go into management for these very reasons, the demand of being in those positions. Women want more money but less demands made on them. Perhaps they know themselves better than the societal planners. Life is short, happiness is ephemeral, looking for happiness in a position or job will not deliver happiness to women.

Many may not like this either. Women have a higher average IQ than men as a group, however they have fewer outliers at both ends of the arc, fewer people of low IQ and fewer people of high IQ. Men overwhelmingly have more people of genius IQ. To me, this fits the pattern of the one in a hundred women who actually match the drive. characteristics , and willingness to sacrifice, the requirements to rise to those positions generally held by men in corporations in private sector and government in public sector.

Personally I find this acceptable. The political and societal push to diversity, equality and inclusion without regard for natural characteristics is a perversion, distortion and derangement of a natural order and leads to mismanagement ,devolution and instability in all institutions who try to force this unnatural development. And massive dissatisfaction and unhappiness.

As a comment on municipal governance. In the 80s while at college in Madison Wisconsin taking a course in commercial real estate underwriting and appraisal under the renown professor, Dr. Graskamp, as part of our course work we studied urban planning, an emerging field. At that time degrees were beginning to be offered in urban planning. Those departments were run by leftists.

Cities evolve organically, generally concentrically within topographical boundaries. Leftist wanted to destroy the separation of the classes, social, racial and economic that happens organically in society. Class warfare, the common refrain of leftists. The old canard of "good intentions". What this leftist central planning utopian idea is leading to is blight, flight, conflict, increased crime, corruption and collapse of infrastructure. There may be a more enlightened governance paradigm awaiting in the future but at the present, the direction is deranged.