July 11, 2025
Apologies for Light Blogging
Dear readers,
I'm going to be busy for the next few days so please bear with me. Lots of stuff going on right now. I'll tell more later.
Tim
I'm going to be busy for the next few days so please bear with me. Lots of stuff going on right now. I'll tell more later.
Tim
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
Murk Does it Again
Timothy Birdnow
Oops she did it again!
Senator Lisa Murkowsky, the Pink Democrat from Alaska who calls herself Republican, voted with the Democrats in a straight-party vote to stop the Trump Administration from relocating the FBI headquarters.
If Murky is going to vote with Democrats the party should make that a permanent thing, kicking her out of the GOP.
Oops she did it again!
Senator Lisa Murkowsky, the Pink Democrat from Alaska who calls herself Republican, voted with the Democrats in a straight-party vote to stop the Trump Administration from relocating the FBI headquarters.
If Murky is going to vote with Democrats the party should make that a permanent thing, kicking her out of the GOP.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
Is Bondi on Her Way Out?
Timothy Birdnow
Megyn Kelly believes Pam Bondi is on her way out due to her gross mishandling of the Jeffrey Epstein issue.
FTA:
She and Patel and Bongino really screwed the pooch with this. If I were Trump I'd ask for all of their resignations; the Administration has lost a LOT of good will, especially from those who thought Trump was a different sort of politician.
Megyn Kelly believes Pam Bondi is on her way out due to her gross mishandling of the Jeffrey Epstein issue.
FTA:
Kelly slammed Bondi, describing the debacle as the worst-ever rollout of information by the DOJ.
She also noted that nothing new—especially relating to a supposed "client list”—has been released since Trump took office.
"Just look at the influencer thing. Just take a step back,” Kelly said.
"What kind of an attorney general would pretend she’s giving new information to some of the president’s most loyal advocates in the press? You know, buying ink by the barrel.
She also noted that nothing new—especially relating to a supposed "client list”—has been released since Trump took office.
"Just look at the influencer thing. Just take a step back,” Kelly said.
"What kind of an attorney general would pretend she’s giving new information to some of the president’s most loyal advocates in the press? You know, buying ink by the barrel.
She and Patel and Bongino really screwed the pooch with this. If I were Trump I'd ask for all of their resignations; the Administration has lost a LOT of good will, especially from those who thought Trump was a different sort of politician.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:07 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 148 words, total size 1 kb.
Global Warming Remains a Tepid Political Issue
Timothy Birdnow
The Democrats and the media have failed to fundamentally sway voters on their pet doomsday scenario. Global Warming aka Climate Change aka global climate flatulence has only moved a scant five percentage points since the George H.W. Bush era, according to the Democrat and CNN pollster Harry Enten.
In 1989 35% of publi worried about global warming, then by 2000 it was 39% and this year it is just at 40%.
So the decades of endless reinforcement and propaganda have failed to sway a sizable portion of the population.
The sad thing is they actually have 40% or the public buying into this stupidity.
In a sane world the leaked Climategate e-mails would have been the final nail in the coffin. Not only has nature failed to verify the models (two major "pauses" in climate warming, No net increase in atmospheric water vapor levels, no major increase in planetary albedo, No actal ice lost around the planet - just in localized spots - etc.) and the models never made sense scientifically anyway (they did things like assume there is no upper limit to the atmosphere, or ignored the logorithmic nature of carbon dioxide to absorbing energy and they failed to take negative feedbacks into account, assuming a high atmospheric sensitivity, etc.) but people notice things like the fact the wealthy aren't selling beachfront property but buying. STILL 40% could be pursuaded by the endless drumbeat - especially coming from what were once actual scientific organizations and agencies. Those of course were proven to be biased with the Climategate e-mails which showed top level researchers, people providing the data being used, conspiring to manipulate not only the data but the science journals and other methods of disseminating information. Of course the media ignored it except when they had to address it, then they found ways to trash it (like claiming these were just a few mumblings taken out of context). And the schools were completely on-board, teaching this as science on a par with Copernicanism or genetics.
Soa sizaable number of people believe in this. Of course a sizable number believe in Bigfoot, or the Loch Ness monster, or aliens who travel hundreds, thousands of light years to probe the anuses of drunken hillbilly hunters in the woods.
In a 2022 study 13% of the public believed in Bigfoot. This despite no actual campaign to make them so believe. Nessie is even worse, with 29% buying it despite deccades of research (it's not that big a lake). And a whopping 34% of Americans think UFO's are space aliens who happen to enjoy people's rectums, probably more so than San Franciscans. (That people who believe alien intelligences would go to the great trouble and expense to cross the immense chasm of space to study the lower digestive tract of a primitive species, and without just using imaging technology but rather with invasive probing, is beyond me.) Suffice it to say you can get at least 10% of people to believe just about anything. P.T. Barnum understood that perfectly.
But, but, but...what of the empiracal evidence, like increased extreme weather events? First, I would point out that the theory says the atmosphere should be warmer and WETTER due to increased water evaporation.I(And we know it's not that as drowning are down worldwide from just a decade ago.) So that knocks out all the droughts, fires, and everything tying in with dryness. Oh, you may see changes to drought patterns some from that, but primarily there will be more rain and other precipitation. So that's half the "evidence" gone right there. Then the rest can be explained through normal things - we have never been able to study the planet or it's heat patterns like now and all this "historical" evidence goes back to the satellite days, starting in 1979. And in fact satellite imaging now is at odds with the surface station data, which runs much waremer. Go to www.surfacestations.org to see how antiquated and ridiculous the surface station data has become; whole cities have grown around the data stations, with air conditioner units, or blacktops, or water treatment plants right next to them. Satellite data shows very, very little warming (for that matter so do the surface stations, but less so). What of extreme weather events? They are no different now than at any time in the past, except that we are building in places now we didn't used to build (like flood plains) and so naturally are experiencing worse from an economic perspective. People are buying beachfront property. We are not seeing any appreciable sea-level rise (no more than we've been seeing for the last ten thousand years). We are only more AWARE of disasters thanks to a 24 hour news cycle and instantaneous communications and rapid travel. It's not more just better covered.
Antarctica has gained ice in recent years. Greenland just did too recently.
So why do many scientists believe in global warming? Because they can't explain why the Earth is 1* warmerthan a century ago.
Well, there are a number of possible reasons. Dr. Roy Spencer from the University of Alabama Huntsville satellitedata program, wrote a paper showing that ALL of the heating is from the Uban Heat Island Effect. Land use changes and artificial heat sources explain the whole enchilada. But this isn't a dramatic doomsday scenario nor does it advance government power and control and money. So the media won't report on this but continues to beat the drum for "climate change", an exploded theory.
That 40% of Americans are still falling for this decades long War of the Worlds scam is behond me. It's always been about money and power and control. Science was subverted to promote it.
The Democrats and the media have failed to fundamentally sway voters on their pet doomsday scenario. Global Warming aka Climate Change aka global climate flatulence has only moved a scant five percentage points since the George H.W. Bush era, according to the Democrat and CNN pollster Harry Enten.
In 1989 35% of publi worried about global warming, then by 2000 it was 39% and this year it is just at 40%.
So the decades of endless reinforcement and propaganda have failed to sway a sizable portion of the population.
The sad thing is they actually have 40% or the public buying into this stupidity.
In a sane world the leaked Climategate e-mails would have been the final nail in the coffin. Not only has nature failed to verify the models (two major "pauses" in climate warming, No net increase in atmospheric water vapor levels, no major increase in planetary albedo, No actal ice lost around the planet - just in localized spots - etc.) and the models never made sense scientifically anyway (they did things like assume there is no upper limit to the atmosphere, or ignored the logorithmic nature of carbon dioxide to absorbing energy and they failed to take negative feedbacks into account, assuming a high atmospheric sensitivity, etc.) but people notice things like the fact the wealthy aren't selling beachfront property but buying. STILL 40% could be pursuaded by the endless drumbeat - especially coming from what were once actual scientific organizations and agencies. Those of course were proven to be biased with the Climategate e-mails which showed top level researchers, people providing the data being used, conspiring to manipulate not only the data but the science journals and other methods of disseminating information. Of course the media ignored it except when they had to address it, then they found ways to trash it (like claiming these were just a few mumblings taken out of context). And the schools were completely on-board, teaching this as science on a par with Copernicanism or genetics.
Soa sizaable number of people believe in this. Of course a sizable number believe in Bigfoot, or the Loch Ness monster, or aliens who travel hundreds, thousands of light years to probe the anuses of drunken hillbilly hunters in the woods.
In a 2022 study 13% of the public believed in Bigfoot. This despite no actual campaign to make them so believe. Nessie is even worse, with 29% buying it despite deccades of research (it's not that big a lake). And a whopping 34% of Americans think UFO's are space aliens who happen to enjoy people's rectums, probably more so than San Franciscans. (That people who believe alien intelligences would go to the great trouble and expense to cross the immense chasm of space to study the lower digestive tract of a primitive species, and without just using imaging technology but rather with invasive probing, is beyond me.) Suffice it to say you can get at least 10% of people to believe just about anything. P.T. Barnum understood that perfectly.
But, but, but...what of the empiracal evidence, like increased extreme weather events? First, I would point out that the theory says the atmosphere should be warmer and WETTER due to increased water evaporation.I(And we know it's not that as drowning are down worldwide from just a decade ago.) So that knocks out all the droughts, fires, and everything tying in with dryness. Oh, you may see changes to drought patterns some from that, but primarily there will be more rain and other precipitation. So that's half the "evidence" gone right there. Then the rest can be explained through normal things - we have never been able to study the planet or it's heat patterns like now and all this "historical" evidence goes back to the satellite days, starting in 1979. And in fact satellite imaging now is at odds with the surface station data, which runs much waremer. Go to www.surfacestations.org to see how antiquated and ridiculous the surface station data has become; whole cities have grown around the data stations, with air conditioner units, or blacktops, or water treatment plants right next to them. Satellite data shows very, very little warming (for that matter so do the surface stations, but less so). What of extreme weather events? They are no different now than at any time in the past, except that we are building in places now we didn't used to build (like flood plains) and so naturally are experiencing worse from an economic perspective. People are buying beachfront property. We are not seeing any appreciable sea-level rise (no more than we've been seeing for the last ten thousand years). We are only more AWARE of disasters thanks to a 24 hour news cycle and instantaneous communications and rapid travel. It's not more just better covered.
Antarctica has gained ice in recent years. Greenland just did too recently.
So why do many scientists believe in global warming? Because they can't explain why the Earth is 1* warmerthan a century ago.
Well, there are a number of possible reasons. Dr. Roy Spencer from the University of Alabama Huntsville satellitedata program, wrote a paper showing that ALL of the heating is from the Uban Heat Island Effect. Land use changes and artificial heat sources explain the whole enchilada. But this isn't a dramatic doomsday scenario nor does it advance government power and control and money. So the media won't report on this but continues to beat the drum for "climate change", an exploded theory.
That 40% of Americans are still falling for this decades long War of the Worlds scam is behond me. It's always been about money and power and control. Science was subverted to promote it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:01 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 962 words, total size 6 kb.
July 09, 2025
No Way NEA!
Timothy Birdnow
And we wonder why education in America is so bad.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1942273473625137652.html
The DEA plots to Resist! Donald Trump.
FTA:
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item "to defend against Trump’s embrace of fascism by using the term facism [sic] in NEA materials correctly characterize Donald Trump's program and actions." Image
The nation's largest teachers union passed a business item "to oppose any move to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education as an illegal, anti-democratic, and racist attempt to destroy public education and privatize it in the interests of the billionaires." Image
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item to "defend birthright citizenship and oppose the attempt to revert to pre-civil rights movement – Jim Crow – legal concepts of 'states rights' in order to deny citizenship to the children of immigrants." Image
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item supporting STUDENTS "dissenting and organizing against Trump’s policies."
They support STUDENTS organizing "against ICE raids and deportations." Image
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item in response to Mahmoud v. Taylor, a new Supreme Court ruling allowing parents to opt their kids out of gender ideology.
They will send out a "Know Your Rights" document and hold "Speak Up, Speak Out" LGBTQ+ conferences.Image
Image
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item to support "affiliates in states where legislative bodies have taken or are taking actions that silence educators"
They list Arkansas and South Carolina as states with "extreme need."
fin
Any questions?
And we wonder why education in America is so bad.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1942273473625137652.html
The DEA plots to Resist! Donald Trump.
FTA:
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item "to defend against Trump’s embrace of fascism by using the term facism [sic] in NEA materials correctly characterize Donald Trump's program and actions." Image
The nation's largest teachers union passed a business item "to oppose any move to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education as an illegal, anti-democratic, and racist attempt to destroy public education and privatize it in the interests of the billionaires." Image
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item to "defend birthright citizenship and oppose the attempt to revert to pre-civil rights movement – Jim Crow – legal concepts of 'states rights' in order to deny citizenship to the children of immigrants." Image
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item supporting STUDENTS "dissenting and organizing against Trump’s policies."
They support STUDENTS organizing "against ICE raids and deportations." Image
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item in response to Mahmoud v. Taylor, a new Supreme Court ruling allowing parents to opt their kids out of gender ideology.
They will send out a "Know Your Rights" document and hold "Speak Up, Speak Out" LGBTQ+ conferences.Image
Image
The nation's largest teachers union adopted a business item to support "affiliates in states where legislative bodies have taken or are taking actions that silence educators"
They list Arkansas and South Carolina as states with "extreme need."
fin
Any questions?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:49 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.
Even EIB is Deep State
Timothy Birdnow
I was listening to Clay Travis and Buck Sexton yesterday and was simply enraged with Travis over his sneering mockery of those who think there is something amiss about the supposed lack of evidence in the Epstein case. We were told he had a client list, and Trump said he'd release it. So did Bondi. So did Patel. In fact Bondi said it was sitting on her desk and she'd release it as soon as legal could look it over. But now she and they are claiming "nothing to see here" , that there never was a client list. So she lied to us back then - or is lying now. And we've been told it was unquestionably a suicide by Epstein and yet they can't produce a tape of his actually killing himself. Everything else, but not that.
Travis mocked at least half of his audience (I've never liked that show particularly; I think both Travis and Sextant are lightweights intellectually). He kept pushing callers "exactly what crimes do you think he was guilty of?" and of course they put on little old ladies who wouldn't slice and dice him. (I know what crimes he was probably guilty of - kidnapping, statutory rape, possibly actual rape, enslavement, prostitution, taking women across state lines for immoral purposes, etc. But he would get these people on then push them hard, so they wouldn't give him a good argument. (In all honesty I probably wouldn't have either under the pressure of being on air before millions of people.)
He even had the disgusting nerve to say "what did these men do? Had sex with women" but they weren't WOMEN they were mostly underage girls, children. These were acts of pedophilia, or at least hebefilia (sexual interest in young teens). It was NOT sex with consenting adults. Oh, and they were not allowed to simply leave the place. There is a reason why it was nicknamed SLAVE ISLAND.
I found his cavalier attitude and smug condescension enraging and will probably not listen to him again. I hope a lot of the stations (many of which are Christian) that carry the Clay and Buck show drop the program. There are better people out there.
I've long thought they were a very poor substitute for Rush Limbaugh. They are boring. And they aren't that sharp. Now I know they are also part of the Establishment. That much is crystal clear.
Travis kept saying that too "you think the entire government is weaponized against us and lying to us". Uh, yeah! It has been for some time. This government has protected the powerful for as long as I've been alive and more than that. Look at MK Ultra, as one example; the CIA was doing mind-control experiments on people and denied it for decades. Look at the EMP effect; when I wrote about it at American Thinker a guy claiming to be part of the Starfish Prime tests scoffed at me and said it was a big lie. A year later Congress finally came out with a report saying it was true. Look at the "Russian collusion" hoax, or the Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation hoax.
Glenn Beck makes some good points
1. Epstein wasn’t a lone predator about Epstein:
2. The digital footprint is too large
3. Intel agency involvement is no longer a fringe theory
4. The system’s silence is telling
5. Every elite institution is on trial
Glenn flushes these out and he's right; there was way too much stuff, too many photos, too much information, for this to have been a solo act by Epstein. He had accomplices. And there are a lot of people with a lot to lose if everything came out.
And Trump and Bondi and Patel and Bongino promised to release it yet now are reneging on that promise. Why?
Something smells quite rotten in the state of Denmark.
The fact that Travis was so busy sneering at his own listeners suggests to me a man who wants not to get to the bottom of something but to cover it up.
this thing is big - bigger than even I suspected. People at the very highest levels are involved in this coverup, and there is no reason to do a coverup unless there is something huge, an earthquake.
I've tried to give Bondi and Patel and Bongino the benefit of the doubt. I've thought that maybe they were hiding what they knew to flush people out and thus make a bigger score. But they are just lying to us now and that insults my intelligence and the intelligence of every American.
As did Clay and Buck. I'm done with them.
I was listening to Clay Travis and Buck Sexton yesterday and was simply enraged with Travis over his sneering mockery of those who think there is something amiss about the supposed lack of evidence in the Epstein case. We were told he had a client list, and Trump said he'd release it. So did Bondi. So did Patel. In fact Bondi said it was sitting on her desk and she'd release it as soon as legal could look it over. But now she and they are claiming "nothing to see here" , that there never was a client list. So she lied to us back then - or is lying now. And we've been told it was unquestionably a suicide by Epstein and yet they can't produce a tape of his actually killing himself. Everything else, but not that.
Travis mocked at least half of his audience (I've never liked that show particularly; I think both Travis and Sextant are lightweights intellectually). He kept pushing callers "exactly what crimes do you think he was guilty of?" and of course they put on little old ladies who wouldn't slice and dice him. (I know what crimes he was probably guilty of - kidnapping, statutory rape, possibly actual rape, enslavement, prostitution, taking women across state lines for immoral purposes, etc. But he would get these people on then push them hard, so they wouldn't give him a good argument. (In all honesty I probably wouldn't have either under the pressure of being on air before millions of people.)
He even had the disgusting nerve to say "what did these men do? Had sex with women" but they weren't WOMEN they were mostly underage girls, children. These were acts of pedophilia, or at least hebefilia (sexual interest in young teens). It was NOT sex with consenting adults. Oh, and they were not allowed to simply leave the place. There is a reason why it was nicknamed SLAVE ISLAND.
I found his cavalier attitude and smug condescension enraging and will probably not listen to him again. I hope a lot of the stations (many of which are Christian) that carry the Clay and Buck show drop the program. There are better people out there.
I've long thought they were a very poor substitute for Rush Limbaugh. They are boring. And they aren't that sharp. Now I know they are also part of the Establishment. That much is crystal clear.
Travis kept saying that too "you think the entire government is weaponized against us and lying to us". Uh, yeah! It has been for some time. This government has protected the powerful for as long as I've been alive and more than that. Look at MK Ultra, as one example; the CIA was doing mind-control experiments on people and denied it for decades. Look at the EMP effect; when I wrote about it at American Thinker a guy claiming to be part of the Starfish Prime tests scoffed at me and said it was a big lie. A year later Congress finally came out with a report saying it was true. Look at the "Russian collusion" hoax, or the Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation hoax.
Glenn Beck makes some good points
1. Epstein wasn’t a lone predator about Epstein:
2. The digital footprint is too large
3. Intel agency involvement is no longer a fringe theory
4. The system’s silence is telling
5. Every elite institution is on trial
Glenn flushes these out and he's right; there was way too much stuff, too many photos, too much information, for this to have been a solo act by Epstein. He had accomplices. And there are a lot of people with a lot to lose if everything came out.
And Trump and Bondi and Patel and Bongino promised to release it yet now are reneging on that promise. Why?
Something smells quite rotten in the state of Denmark.
The fact that Travis was so busy sneering at his own listeners suggests to me a man who wants not to get to the bottom of something but to cover it up.
this thing is big - bigger than even I suspected. People at the very highest levels are involved in this coverup, and there is no reason to do a coverup unless there is something huge, an earthquake.
I've tried to give Bondi and Patel and Bongino the benefit of the doubt. I've thought that maybe they were hiding what they knew to flush people out and thus make a bigger score. But they are just lying to us now and that insults my intelligence and the intelligence of every American.
As did Clay and Buck. I'm done with them.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:15 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 790 words, total size 5 kb.
Trump Morphing into George W. Bush
Timothy Birdnow
Donald Trump, recently accused of calling for an amnesty for illegal aliens after suggesting long-term aliens in America should be allowed to work, has backpeddled, now saying he's not in favor of amnesty but of a work program for laborers. Hmmm. Where have we heard this before?
Oh yes; George W. Bush promoted this same idea. He called it a "guest worker program" which was the same thing.
Most of us opposed it at the time because we all knew how it would play out; these "guest workers" would be here a year or two then want to stay and we'd acquisce. There would be talk of a need for a "path to citizenship" since these people were living here anyway and doing the "work Americans just won't do". In the end you have a backdoor amnesty.
also, it creates a serf class. It's much like the Romans importing Germans to do the work "Romans just won't do" and then being amazed when the Germans took over.
We understood this then. Now Mr. Trump is trying to bring back this moldy oldy.
From the Blaze article:
I am loathe to listen to a labor secretary named Chavez, I might add. Anyone remember Hugo Chavez? Or the commie labor leader Cesar Chavez?
If we are going to do a "work program" what is to stop these folks from just leaving and hiding inside the U.S.? Nothing. At a minimum they should have to have an ankle monitor like someone under house arrest; you can't let them take these jobs and expect them to go home at the end of a season or whatnot. They won't do it, and the Democrats won't let it happen.
And once here getting them out will be a real bear.
The fact is the Democrats will fight tooth and nail to keep them here once they are in the country. And they will fight to eventually give them citizenship and the vote. Oh, and use them to increase their numbers in the census so they can hold more House seats.
Also, Trump will only be here four years. The left will simply wait it out and then use this guest worker program to begin refilling the country with aliens to offer amnesty and "a path to citizenship".
Mr. Trump is making a horribly foolish error. He often mocked the Bush family, and yet he's planning to implement the same policies that Bush wanted. Bush had to withdraw that plan because of a public backlash. Let us hope Trump does the same.
Donald Trump, recently accused of calling for an amnesty for illegal aliens after suggesting long-term aliens in America should be allowed to work, has backpeddled, now saying he's not in favor of amnesty but of a work program for laborers. Hmmm. Where have we heard this before?
Oh yes; George W. Bush promoted this same idea. He called it a "guest worker program" which was the same thing.
Most of us opposed it at the time because we all knew how it would play out; these "guest workers" would be here a year or two then want to stay and we'd acquisce. There would be talk of a need for a "path to citizenship" since these people were living here anyway and doing the "work Americans just won't do". In the end you have a backdoor amnesty.
also, it creates a serf class. It's much like the Romans importing Germans to do the work "Romans just won't do" and then being amazed when the Germans took over.
We understood this then. Now Mr. Trump is trying to bring back this moldy oldy.
From the Blaze article:
President Donald Trump denied that his administration was exploring an amnesty program for illegal aliens after reports of a whisper campaign advocating the controversial policy emerged.
The president made the comments during a media briefing with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins when asked about the possibility of an amnesty program.
'We got to work with the farmers and people that have hotels and leisure properties too. We're going to work with them, and we're going to work very strong and smart.'
"There's no amnesty," said the president. "What we're doing is we're getting rid of criminals, but we are doing a work program."
"This morning we talked about protecting the farmers and the farmland, but obviously this president's vision of no amnesty, mass deportation continues," Rollins explained, "but in a strategic way, and then ensuring that our farmers have the labor that they need."
"[Labor] Sec. Chavez-DeRemer has been a leader on this. Obviously this comes out of the Labor Department, but moving toward automation, ensuring that our farmers have that workforce, and moving toward an American workforce. So all of the above," she added.
The president made the comments during a media briefing with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins when asked about the possibility of an amnesty program.
'We got to work with the farmers and people that have hotels and leisure properties too. We're going to work with them, and we're going to work very strong and smart.'
"There's no amnesty," said the president. "What we're doing is we're getting rid of criminals, but we are doing a work program."
"This morning we talked about protecting the farmers and the farmland, but obviously this president's vision of no amnesty, mass deportation continues," Rollins explained, "but in a strategic way, and then ensuring that our farmers have the labor that they need."
"[Labor] Sec. Chavez-DeRemer has been a leader on this. Obviously this comes out of the Labor Department, but moving toward automation, ensuring that our farmers have that workforce, and moving toward an American workforce. So all of the above," she added.
I am loathe to listen to a labor secretary named Chavez, I might add. Anyone remember Hugo Chavez? Or the commie labor leader Cesar Chavez?
If we are going to do a "work program" what is to stop these folks from just leaving and hiding inside the U.S.? Nothing. At a minimum they should have to have an ankle monitor like someone under house arrest; you can't let them take these jobs and expect them to go home at the end of a season or whatnot. They won't do it, and the Democrats won't let it happen.
And once here getting them out will be a real bear.
The fact is the Democrats will fight tooth and nail to keep them here once they are in the country. And they will fight to eventually give them citizenship and the vote. Oh, and use them to increase their numbers in the census so they can hold more House seats.
Also, Trump will only be here four years. The left will simply wait it out and then use this guest worker program to begin refilling the country with aliens to offer amnesty and "a path to citizenship".
Mr. Trump is making a horribly foolish error. He often mocked the Bush family, and yet he's planning to implement the same policies that Bush wanted. Bush had to withdraw that plan because of a public backlash. Let us hope Trump does the same.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:23 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 617 words, total size 4 kb.
Foot Drop
Timothy Birdnow
And now for something completely different...
Terry Gilliam: Trump Saved Us From Humorless Woke Scolds
Foot drop.
And now for something completely different...
Terry Gilliam: Trump Saved Us From Humorless Woke Scolds
Foot drop.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:54 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
Vote Early, VoteOften
Timothy Birdnow
Gee; I thought there was no vote fraud in America!
9 Suspects, Including Multiple Democrat Officials, Indicted For Voter Fraud
They have told us repeatedly there is little to no fraud, and that what fraud there is is inconsequential. I ask you, would you risk prison if it were inconsequential? And as more and more of this comes to light it's obvious it's not minimal.
Gee; I thought there was no vote fraud in America!
9 Suspects, Including Multiple Democrat Officials, Indicted For Voter Fraud
They have told us repeatedly there is little to no fraud, and that what fraud there is is inconsequential. I ask you, would you risk prison if it were inconsequential? And as more and more of this comes to light it's obvious it's not minimal.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:50 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
Judge Refuses to Toss Charges against Backdoor Dugan
Timothy Birdnow
Prosecutions against Judge "Back Door" Hannah Dugan may proceed, a judge has ruled in the case of the radical judge who snuck an illegal alien criminal out her back door to avoid ICE (no, that's not a dirty reference.)
The judge tried to argue she was immune from prosecution because of separation of powers. But being immune from prosecution in the discharge of her duties is a world away from what Dugan pulled, which was to purposely thwart Federal officials in the discharge of theirs.
The author of the Hot Air article thinks the DoJ will drop charges if the judge admits to wrongdoing and faces a disciplinary board. I'm not so sure, nor am I sure they should. The Administration needs to make an example of her. That they didn't do so in a similar case in Trump's first term is immaterial; that was when Trump still thought these people would eventually see reason. Now he understands they only understand power.
Prosecutions against Judge "Back Door" Hannah Dugan may proceed, a judge has ruled in the case of the radical judge who snuck an illegal alien criminal out her back door to avoid ICE (no, that's not a dirty reference.)
The judge tried to argue she was immune from prosecution because of separation of powers. But being immune from prosecution in the discharge of her duties is a world away from what Dugan pulled, which was to purposely thwart Federal officials in the discharge of theirs.
The author of the Hot Air article thinks the DoJ will drop charges if the judge admits to wrongdoing and faces a disciplinary board. I'm not so sure, nor am I sure they should. The Administration needs to make an example of her. That they didn't do so in a similar case in Trump's first term is immaterial; that was when Trump still thought these people would eventually see reason. Now he understands they only understand power.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:47 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
Brennan, Comey, Under Investigation
Timothy Birdnow
High time.
FBI Launches Criminal Investigations Of John Brennan, James Comey
High time.
FBI Launches Criminal Investigations Of John Brennan, James Comey
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:19 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
Smokey Bear Land
Timothy Birdnow
Isn't this a violation of civil rights?
LA City Council Votes to Stop ‘Disaster Tourism’ through Pacific Palisades Area
As the author observes:
Kind of a Disaster Disney Land, only more realistic since it is, uh, real.
But I ask what right do they have to stop people from going through when they aren't actually rebuilding? Of course the reason they want to ban this tourism is to hide their abject failure to rebuild. It's purely political.
Someone should really tear this place down and build a Smokey the Bear theme park on the spot.
Isn't this a violation of civil rights?
LA City Council Votes to Stop ‘Disaster Tourism’ through Pacific Palisades Area
As the author observes:
"Facing a $1 billion deficit, LA should expand the tours to include homeless camps, drug dens, and ICE riots … and charge a fee.
Kind of a Disaster Disney Land, only more realistic since it is, uh, real.
But I ask what right do they have to stop people from going through when they aren't actually rebuilding? Of course the reason they want to ban this tourism is to hide their abject failure to rebuild. It's purely political.
Someone should really tear this place down and build a Smokey the Bear theme park on the spot.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:04 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.
July 08, 2025
Ending a Taxing Situation
Timothy Birdnow
I would say this is wonderful but given the sorry state of churches these days and their wokeness it may be a disaster for us.
Trump’s IRS Says Churches Can Endorse Political Candidates Without Losing Tax Status
The de-politicization of churches began during the Lyndon Johnson when he was in the Senate. Johnson - and the Democrats - were being hurt very badly by churches, especially in the South. He took action, giving a new tax credit to churches PROVIDED they stay far away from politics. Money talks, in fact it seduces and most churches took the cash over their souls. The end result is Christianity, which had been a powerful force in public life, withered and became an impotent social club.
Trump is trying to reverse this but I fear after generations of liberalism infesting most churches it will probably work to the benefit of the Demo-left, not Middle America. The endorsements will all go to Democrats.
I know the Catholic Church will endorse whoever the donks put up.
FTA:
Well, they generally don't bother with it when it comes to LIBERAL churches. Right wing churches have been another matter, at least to some degree.
There is a reason why Catholic bishops do not deny Nancy Pelosi or AOC Communion; it's not because they don't want to chase them off. By canon law both are ex-communicated, meaning tehy may not receive Holy Communion because they are in an open state of sin - advocatting for abortions. This is one of the most condemned positions a Catholic can take and it is grounds for ex-communication. (Actually they ARE excommunicated but the Church is fearful of saying so lest they get in trouble with the IRS.)
Now at least the Church can ex-communicate them. But will they? I doubt it at this point, what with the Left solidly in control of U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
But it's still a good thing, one long overdue. Maybe we can start to restore the churches to where they should be - arbiters of moral decency. The social club approach to Christianity has done nothing but make the churches a quaint and archaic institution from a bygone age.
I would say this is wonderful but given the sorry state of churches these days and their wokeness it may be a disaster for us.
Trump’s IRS Says Churches Can Endorse Political Candidates Without Losing Tax Status
The de-politicization of churches began during the Lyndon Johnson when he was in the Senate. Johnson - and the Democrats - were being hurt very badly by churches, especially in the South. He took action, giving a new tax credit to churches PROVIDED they stay far away from politics. Money talks, in fact it seduces and most churches took the cash over their souls. The end result is Christianity, which had been a powerful force in public life, withered and became an impotent social club.
Trump is trying to reverse this but I fear after generations of liberalism infesting most churches it will probably work to the benefit of the Demo-left, not Middle America. The endorsements will all go to Democrats.
I know the Catholic Church will endorse whoever the donks put up.
FTA:
The IRS made clear its stance on churches endorsing political candidates in front of their congregations, saying in a court filing on Monday that houses of worship are free to push political candidates from the pulpit without fear of losing their tax-exempt status.
The IRS clarification came in a lawsuit court filing after two Texas churches and an association of Christian broadcasters sued, seeking an exemption from the ban on churches endorsing political candidates, The New York Times reported. While the plaintiffs sought a carve-out for all nonprofits, the IRS agreed in a court filing to allow churches to endorse candidates without penalty.
According to the IRS, the Johnson Amendment — which has been part of the U.S. tax code since 1954 — does not prohibit a church from communicating with its congregants about its preferred political candidates, comparing such endorsements to "a family discussion concerning candidates.”
"Thus, communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted,” the agency wrote in the court filing.
The IRS added that it has long refrained from enforcing the Johnson Amendment against churches "for speech concerning electoral politics in the context of worship services.” For several years, pastors from around the country organized to test the tax code during "Pulpit Freedom Sunday,” The Washington Post reported. The IRS only launched one investigation stemming from "Pulpit Freedom Sunday,” and the agency did not punish any churches.
The IRS clarification came in a lawsuit court filing after two Texas churches and an association of Christian broadcasters sued, seeking an exemption from the ban on churches endorsing political candidates, The New York Times reported. While the plaintiffs sought a carve-out for all nonprofits, the IRS agreed in a court filing to allow churches to endorse candidates without penalty.
According to the IRS, the Johnson Amendment — which has been part of the U.S. tax code since 1954 — does not prohibit a church from communicating with its congregants about its preferred political candidates, comparing such endorsements to "a family discussion concerning candidates.”
"Thus, communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted,” the agency wrote in the court filing.
The IRS added that it has long refrained from enforcing the Johnson Amendment against churches "for speech concerning electoral politics in the context of worship services.” For several years, pastors from around the country organized to test the tax code during "Pulpit Freedom Sunday,” The Washington Post reported. The IRS only launched one investigation stemming from "Pulpit Freedom Sunday,” and the agency did not punish any churches.
Well, they generally don't bother with it when it comes to LIBERAL churches. Right wing churches have been another matter, at least to some degree.
There is a reason why Catholic bishops do not deny Nancy Pelosi or AOC Communion; it's not because they don't want to chase them off. By canon law both are ex-communicated, meaning tehy may not receive Holy Communion because they are in an open state of sin - advocatting for abortions. This is one of the most condemned positions a Catholic can take and it is grounds for ex-communication. (Actually they ARE excommunicated but the Church is fearful of saying so lest they get in trouble with the IRS.)
Now at least the Church can ex-communicate them. But will they? I doubt it at this point, what with the Left solidly in control of U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
But it's still a good thing, one long overdue. Maybe we can start to restore the churches to where they should be - arbiters of moral decency. The social club approach to Christianity has done nothing but make the churches a quaint and archaic institution from a bygone age.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:51 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 627 words, total size 4 kb.
USAID Gave Thousands of Viruses to China
Timothy Birdnow
Lookie here; it wasn't just Covid sent to that Chinese lab in Wuhan. USAID sent literally THOUSANDS of viral strains there for the Chicoms to experiment with.
FTA:
We KNOW gain of function research was ongoing at Wuhan, and this essentially gave China huge resources to develop biological weapons.
I would call this insane but that's an insult to the mentally unbalanced. It's evil.
Here's more:
So we basically gave them to China without so much as a basic agreement to guarantee our control of them.
This is deadly serious; we're giving China potential biological weapons (as indeed I think Covid was - it wasn't that deadly by design, so they couldn't be blamed, but it was engineered, I believe, to be used against us.) There is absolutely no excuse for doing this; if we want to store this stuff we should build our own virus bank, say, on Bikini Island where it would be safe. And it should be run by USAAMRID, the Army biological wing.
Anybody but the Chinese. They are our enemies.
Lookie here; it wasn't just Covid sent to that Chinese lab in Wuhan. USAID sent literally THOUSANDS of viral strains there for the Chicoms to experiment with.
FTA:
The documents show that USAID funded the exportation of 11,000 samples from Yunnan Province, where some of the closest relatives of the COVID-19 virus circulate, to Wuhan, the epicenter of the pandemic, with no apparent plan for ensuring the samples were not misdirected to bioweapons and remained accessible to the U.S. government.
A $210 million USAID public health program called PREDICT, steered by the University of California-Davis, collected viral samples in countries throughout the globe but lacked long-term storage when funding dried up, according to rudimentary plans in 2019.
USAID’s sample dispensation plan for China is sparse: "No need [sic] information from Yunnan. They were never an official lab partner for PREDICT. All samples they helped collected [sic] are sent to, tested, and stored in Wuhan.
A $210 million USAID public health program called PREDICT, steered by the University of California-Davis, collected viral samples in countries throughout the globe but lacked long-term storage when funding dried up, according to rudimentary plans in 2019.
USAID’s sample dispensation plan for China is sparse: "No need [sic] information from Yunnan. They were never an official lab partner for PREDICT. All samples they helped collected [sic] are sent to, tested, and stored in Wuhan.
We KNOW gain of function research was ongoing at Wuhan, and this essentially gave China huge resources to develop biological weapons.
I would call this insane but that's an insult to the mentally unbalanced. It's evil.
Here's more:
Many of the viruses stored at the lab in Wuhan may have been sampled with U.S. funding yet remain out of reach for U.S. government entities investigating the origins of COVID.
The samples were set to be preserved for testing – with human samples preserved for 10 years – the documents show. But the documents suggest that requirement was never incorporated into a formal contract with USAID.
The samples were set to be preserved for testing – with human samples preserved for 10 years – the documents show. But the documents suggest that requirement was never incorporated into a formal contract with USAID.
So we basically gave them to China without so much as a basic agreement to guarantee our control of them.
This is deadly serious; we're giving China potential biological weapons (as indeed I think Covid was - it wasn't that deadly by design, so they couldn't be blamed, but it was engineered, I believe, to be used against us.) There is absolutely no excuse for doing this; if we want to store this stuff we should build our own virus bank, say, on Bikini Island where it would be safe. And it should be run by USAAMRID, the Army biological wing.
Anybody but the Chinese. They are our enemies.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:08 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 375 words, total size 3 kb.
The Argentine Miracle
Timothy Birdnow
This is what happens when you take the jackboot off the throats of enterpreneurs and the citizenry.
Argentine Economy Grows 7.6% in Q2
Oh, and Milei lowered inflation from 26% to1.5%.
Capitalism - works every time it's tried.
This is what happens when you take the jackboot off the throats of enterpreneurs and the citizenry.
Argentine Economy Grows 7.6% in Q2
Oh, and Milei lowered inflation from 26% to1.5%.
Capitalism - works every time it's tried.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:04 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
Republicans Mulling Amnesty?
Timothy Birdnow
This is disturbing; apparently the RINO wing of the GOP now wants to grant amnesty to millions of illegals just as we finally have the funding and the tools to stop the invasion of our country. And with a "pathway to citizenship" the GOP will again become a minority party, and forever.
We've seen how amnesties have treated us in the past. Ronald Reagan listened to his party and amnetized three million aliens, almost all of whom immediately became Democrats.
Here'sThe how it teated Republicans:
This was the same year the amnesty took affect.
And the GOP lost seats in the House and Senate in '88 and again in '92. The slide was only reversed after the failed Hillarycare attempt frightened the public into electing Newt Gingrich and the "Contract with America" which promised a good game but fell woefully short.
The frightening aspect of this is that Donald Trump appears ready to do this.
Trump is quoted in the article (which I do not excerpt as Redstate does not permit that, at least not with my antiquated system) as saying he doesn't think long-term illegals should be kicked out and he spoke of the need for keeping cheap labor in the country to do gardening and hotel staffing and whatnot. That means he's thinking of amnetizing at least a portion of the illegals. That is unacceptable and a betrayal of the American People, who will turn on him. If Trump does this, if the GOP does this, it will spell the end of MAGA and the Republican Party.
I cannot fathom how tone-deaf the GOP has become - and even Mr. Trump.
Following the report by Charlie Kirk, a number of Republicans (including Eric Schmidt, my own Senator) have come out strongly against any sort of amnesty. They are right.
BTW Mr. Trump has actually deported FEWER illegals than Barack Insane Obama (pee, er, peace be upon him) and Trump is on pace to deport FEWER aliens than Joe (no borders) Biden during his last year in office. That is disturbing. Of course he's been hamstrung by endless court rulings which have pretty much slowed the extraction. And many have self-deported, saving us the trouble, but it is a bit worrisome. I have no doubt Mr. Trump employs more than just a few illegals in his hotel business and at his golf courses.
il·le·gal /i(l)ˈlēɡ(ə)l,əˈlēɡ(ə)l/
adjective
contrary to or forbidden by law, especially criminal law.
Any questions? It doesn't matter how long they've been in the country. They need to leave and actually apply for residency like most of our ancestors did. Case closed.
This is disturbing; apparently the RINO wing of the GOP now wants to grant amnesty to millions of illegals just as we finally have the funding and the tools to stop the invasion of our country. And with a "pathway to citizenship" the GOP will again become a minority party, and forever.
We've seen how amnesties have treated us in the past. Ronald Reagan listened to his party and amnetized three million aliens, almost all of whom immediately became Democrats.
Here'sThe how it teated Republicans:
Democrats gained a net eight seats, and recaptured control of the Senate from the Republicans with a 55–45 majority. They defeated seven incumbents, all but one of whom had been elected in 1980, and gained open seats held by retiring Republicans in Maryland and Nevada. Republicans gained one open seat in Missouri.
This was the same year the amnesty took affect.
And the GOP lost seats in the House and Senate in '88 and again in '92. The slide was only reversed after the failed Hillarycare attempt frightened the public into electing Newt Gingrich and the "Contract with America" which promised a good game but fell woefully short.
The frightening aspect of this is that Donald Trump appears ready to do this.
Trump is quoted in the article (which I do not excerpt as Redstate does not permit that, at least not with my antiquated system) as saying he doesn't think long-term illegals should be kicked out and he spoke of the need for keeping cheap labor in the country to do gardening and hotel staffing and whatnot. That means he's thinking of amnetizing at least a portion of the illegals. That is unacceptable and a betrayal of the American People, who will turn on him. If Trump does this, if the GOP does this, it will spell the end of MAGA and the Republican Party.
I cannot fathom how tone-deaf the GOP has become - and even Mr. Trump.
Following the report by Charlie Kirk, a number of Republicans (including Eric Schmidt, my own Senator) have come out strongly against any sort of amnesty. They are right.
BTW Mr. Trump has actually deported FEWER illegals than Barack Insane Obama (pee, er, peace be upon him) and Trump is on pace to deport FEWER aliens than Joe (no borders) Biden during his last year in office. That is disturbing. Of course he's been hamstrung by endless court rulings which have pretty much slowed the extraction. And many have self-deported, saving us the trouble, but it is a bit worrisome. I have no doubt Mr. Trump employs more than just a few illegals in his hotel business and at his golf courses.
il·le·gal /i(l)ˈlēɡ(ə)l,əˈlēɡ(ə)l/
adjective
contrary to or forbidden by law, especially criminal law.
Any questions? It doesn't matter how long they've been in the country. They need to leave and actually apply for residency like most of our ancestors did. Case closed.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 492 words, total size 3 kb.
Kiss them Goodbye!
Timothy Birdnow
Na,na,na,na...na, na,na, na...hey hey hey...gooodbyeeeee!
Hamas Security Officer: Let’s Face It, We’re Finished
They went too far and got what was coming to them. If this were the Mafia they would be found on the docks with their genitalia stuffed in their mouths.
Na,na,na,na...na, na,na, na...hey hey hey...gooodbyeeeee!
Hamas Security Officer: Let’s Face It, We’re Finished
They went too far and got what was coming to them. If this were the Mafia they would be found on the docks with their genitalia stuffed in their mouths.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:05 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
Legal Insurrection
Timothy Birdnow
What part of the Supreme Court's ruling against nationwide injunctions don't the leftist judges understand?
Federal Judge Blocks Planned Parenthood Defunding in Big, Beautiful Bill
From Just the News:
See what they are doing? They know they are going to be rebuked by SCOTUS but they don't care; they want to waste time, tie up the Administration, and snipe at them from the shadows. As SCOTUS has no actual authority over lower courts (just authority over their decisions) they cannot enforce their own ruling about sweeping injunctions. What we are seeing is an insurrecftion by lower courts.
So, let me get this straight - this judge says Congess is expressing "disapproval of, attacking, and punishing" Planned Parenthood and somehow that is wrong. Well, how are they doing it? Simply by cutting off taxpayer dollars to the pro-abortion organization. I ask you, would it somehow be acceptable for Congress to fund, say, the Ku Klux Klan? No? Then why are they legally obligated to fund Planned Parenthood. In fact why are they legally obligated to use taxpaer dollars to fund ANYTHING? Where in the Constitution does it say Congress must use taxpayer money to fund private organizations?
And of course to issue such an injunction this judge MUST appeal to Constitutionality. He has no leg to stand on otherwise as this is a law, duly and properly passed by Congress. His only option in stopping it is to declare it unconstitutional.
So,where in the Constitution is the authorization for this? I can't find it in my copy. It's not listed in the enumerated powers.
And animus towards an organization is not within the scope of this judge's authority. She is supposed to rule on the law, not on feelings or fairness-and especially not on assumed emotions. You might think a person who has their house foreclosed on is getting a raw deal and they might be but if the protocols set forth by the law are followed the judge is obligated to rule for the lender. How is this any different?
Judges are supposed to follow the law, not their own whims.
Sadly there is no mechanism short of impeachment or dissolving the court that allows for the removal of such a judge. There should be, and SCOTUS should be able to file a writ against any judge who openly disobeys their rulings. But that provision is not there so these creeps can keep pulling this and face no disciplinary actions.
Well, there are other ways to discipline besides removal. I would suggest the House and Senate judiciary committees call this judge before them and rack her over the coals. Lay a perjory trap for her. Send the IRS to investigate her business dealings. Look into her political contacts. Make life miserable for this Puta.
Until there are real consequences for this kind of lawless behavior it will keep happening. Congress needs to address this.
What part of the Supreme Court's ruling against nationwide injunctions don't the leftist judges understand?
Federal Judge Blocks Planned Parenthood Defunding in Big, Beautiful Bill
From Just the News:
A federal judge in Boston on Monday blocked the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act’s provisions to defund Planned Parenthood, just days after President Donald Trump signed the law.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, an Obama appointee, issued the temporary restraining order
The ruling comes in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling that dramatically limited the scope of nationwide injunctions by lower court judges and is sure to lead to a legal fight with the administration.
"The true design of the Defund Provision is simply to express disapproval of, attack, and punish Planned Parenthood, which plays a particularly prominent role in the public debate over abortion,” Planned Parenthood argued in its suit, per Reuters. The case in the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, an Obama appointee, issued the temporary restraining order
The ruling comes in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling that dramatically limited the scope of nationwide injunctions by lower court judges and is sure to lead to a legal fight with the administration.
"The true design of the Defund Provision is simply to express disapproval of, attack, and punish Planned Parenthood, which plays a particularly prominent role in the public debate over abortion,” Planned Parenthood argued in its suit, per Reuters. The case in the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts.
See what they are doing? They know they are going to be rebuked by SCOTUS but they don't care; they want to waste time, tie up the Administration, and snipe at them from the shadows. As SCOTUS has no actual authority over lower courts (just authority over their decisions) they cannot enforce their own ruling about sweeping injunctions. What we are seeing is an insurrecftion by lower courts.
So, let me get this straight - this judge says Congess is expressing "disapproval of, attacking, and punishing" Planned Parenthood and somehow that is wrong. Well, how are they doing it? Simply by cutting off taxpayer dollars to the pro-abortion organization. I ask you, would it somehow be acceptable for Congress to fund, say, the Ku Klux Klan? No? Then why are they legally obligated to fund Planned Parenthood. In fact why are they legally obligated to use taxpaer dollars to fund ANYTHING? Where in the Constitution does it say Congress must use taxpayer money to fund private organizations?
And of course to issue such an injunction this judge MUST appeal to Constitutionality. He has no leg to stand on otherwise as this is a law, duly and properly passed by Congress. His only option in stopping it is to declare it unconstitutional.
So,where in the Constitution is the authorization for this? I can't find it in my copy. It's not listed in the enumerated powers.
And animus towards an organization is not within the scope of this judge's authority. She is supposed to rule on the law, not on feelings or fairness-and especially not on assumed emotions. You might think a person who has their house foreclosed on is getting a raw deal and they might be but if the protocols set forth by the law are followed the judge is obligated to rule for the lender. How is this any different?
Judges are supposed to follow the law, not their own whims.
Sadly there is no mechanism short of impeachment or dissolving the court that allows for the removal of such a judge. There should be, and SCOTUS should be able to file a writ against any judge who openly disobeys their rulings. But that provision is not there so these creeps can keep pulling this and face no disciplinary actions.
Well, there are other ways to discipline besides removal. I would suggest the House and Senate judiciary committees call this judge before them and rack her over the coals. Lay a perjory trap for her. Send the IRS to investigate her business dealings. Look into her political contacts. Make life miserable for this Puta.
Until there are real consequences for this kind of lawless behavior it will keep happening. Congress needs to address this.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:54 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 611 words, total size 4 kb.
Dems Call for Violence
Timothy Birdnow
Democrats are now openly calling for insurrection as they told Axios their constituents want them to "resist" up to and including violently and face getting shot.
Violence in the service of politics is terrorism, and inciting violence in groups is insurrection.
Democrats say these mysterious voters who are demanding insurrection are usually "white and wealthy". (That means they know who they are and that the Democratic party is now the party of the rich.)
FTA:
Who pray tell? It is their duty to divulge these terrorism advocates.
Also, how much of this is their constituency and how much is what they themselves want?
The Constitution guarantees the right of free speech and of assembly, provided both are peaceful. This is not free speech - it's a call to insurrection.
Mike Johnson should supeona these Democrats and demand names and dates UNDER OATH. If they won't cooperate cite them with contept of Congress. You can't have legislators going around inciting violence.
According to the article the Democrats are being pressured by their voters, who are suffering from anger and despair at the Democrats not doing enough "puts us in a different position where … we can’t keep following norms of decorum.”. Of course the party knows that they will lose the majority of Americans if they walk down this route; they've been there before and lost. Oh, and there is a big difference between calling for violence and "the rules of decorum".
Basically these are crybabies who aren't used to losing and now are going to throw their weight around in anger. They thought America was just one Presidency away from becoming the Soviet republic they so long have dreamed about, and it's slipped through their fingers. But it's not Trump they are raging against but the American People themselves. American didn't want what they were selling.
So, like your typical spoiled brat, they are now throwing a temper tantrum.
Since when have the Democrats EVER "played the Republicans game"? They used the dirtiest, most evil tactics to take out Mr. Trump over the last eight years; they can't devise any more creative or dishonest ways of gaming the system. Lawfare. Outright lies by the media. Attacking his people. Rioting in multiple cities. Opening the border to steal the election. You name it they've tried it. Now, with none of these efforts bearing fruit, they are going to the final option - revolution.
It was entirely predictable.
One anonymous House Democrat told Axios that constituents have said that "civility isn’t working” and told them they need to be prepared for "violence … to fight to protect our democracy.
"Protect our democracy" or their own power? Who is it who is actually following the laws of the land? Mr. Biden engaged in an insurrection when he opened the borders in violation of our own laws. The Democrats engaged in insurrection when they framed President Trump. Everything they've done for the last twenty years has been a violation of our laws and of our democratic process. Me think they doth protest too much.
That's right; they've ratcheted up the hateful rhetoric, painting Trump as a monster who made Hitler look like a piker. You can't paint someone as worse than Hitler and not expect the unhinged to turn violent.
We need to find out who these people are and punish them to the fullest extent of the law.
I've long been a student of revolutions and this is how revolutions are made. One side simply refuses to accept they've lost and rejects the basic rules of conduct. That's what we are seeing now. The Democrats are not a political party but increasingly a revolutionary council.
Democrats are now openly calling for insurrection as they told Axios their constituents want them to "resist" up to and including violently and face getting shot.
Violence in the service of politics is terrorism, and inciting violence in groups is insurrection.
Democrats say these mysterious voters who are demanding insurrection are usually "white and wealthy". (That means they know who they are and that the Democratic party is now the party of the rich.)
FTA:
"Some of them have suggested … what we really need to do is be willing to get shot” when visiting United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities or federal government agencies, one House Democrat told Axios.
Who pray tell? It is their duty to divulge these terrorism advocates.
Also, how much of this is their constituency and how much is what they themselves want?
"Our own base is telling us that what we’re doing is not good enough … [that] there needs to be blood to grab the attention of the press and the public,” the Democratic lawmaker added.
The Constitution guarantees the right of free speech and of assembly, provided both are peaceful. This is not free speech - it's a call to insurrection.
Mike Johnson should supeona these Democrats and demand names and dates UNDER OATH. If they won't cooperate cite them with contept of Congress. You can't have legislators going around inciting violence.
According to the article the Democrats are being pressured by their voters, who are suffering from anger and despair at the Democrats not doing enough "puts us in a different position where … we can’t keep following norms of decorum.”. Of course the party knows that they will lose the majority of Americans if they walk down this route; they've been there before and lost. Oh, and there is a big difference between calling for violence and "the rules of decorum".
Basically these are crybabies who aren't used to losing and now are going to throw their weight around in anger. They thought America was just one Presidency away from becoming the Soviet republic they so long have dreamed about, and it's slipped through their fingers. But it's not Trump they are raging against but the American People themselves. American didn't want what they were selling.
So, like your typical spoiled brat, they are now throwing a temper tantrum.
"This idea that we’re going to save every norm and that we’re not going to play [Republicans’] game … I don’t think that’s resonating with voters anymore,” another anonymous House Democrat told the outle.
Since when have the Democrats EVER "played the Republicans game"? They used the dirtiest, most evil tactics to take out Mr. Trump over the last eight years; they can't devise any more creative or dishonest ways of gaming the system. Lawfare. Outright lies by the media. Attacking his people. Rioting in multiple cities. Opening the border to steal the election. You name it they've tried it. Now, with none of these efforts bearing fruit, they are going to the final option - revolution.
It was entirely predictable.
One anonymous House Democrat told Axios that constituents have said that "civility isn’t working” and told them they need to be prepared for "violence … to fight to protect our democracy.
"Protect our democracy" or their own power? Who is it who is actually following the laws of the land? Mr. Biden engaged in an insurrection when he opened the borders in violation of our own laws. The Democrats engaged in insurrection when they framed President Trump. Everything they've done for the last twenty years has been a violation of our laws and of our democratic process. Me think they doth protest too much.
"Democrats built this monster. Now it’s turning on them, and the 2026 primaries are going to produce some of the most unhinged candidates we’ve ever seen,
That's right; they've ratcheted up the hateful rhetoric, painting Trump as a monster who made Hitler look like a piker. You can't paint someone as worse than Hitler and not expect the unhinged to turn violent.
We need to find out who these people are and punish them to the fullest extent of the law.
I've long been a student of revolutions and this is how revolutions are made. One side simply refuses to accept they've lost and rejects the basic rules of conduct. That's what we are seeing now. The Democrats are not a political party but increasingly a revolutionary council.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:17 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 748 words, total size 5 kb.
July 07, 2025
Multiculturalism is Fine as Long as the Mainstream is Condemned
Timothy Birdnow
Yep.
The desire to preserve one's culture and homeland is only xenophobic when white people are the ones expressing it https://t.co/sAsDAKtYUN
— Cabot Phillips (@cabot_phillips) July 6, 2025
Yep.
The desire to preserve one's culture and homeland is only xenophobic when white people are the ones expressing it https://t.co/sAsDAKtYUN
— Cabot Phillips (@cabot_phillips) July 6, 2025
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:19 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
<< Page 1 of 933 >>
88kb generated in CPU 0.0247, elapsed 0.3016 seconds.
45 queries taking 0.2884 seconds, 234 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
45 queries taking 0.2884 seconds, 234 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
