Dana Mathewson

In fact, he pretty much eviscerates them, with class (of course).

http://www.urgentagenda.com/PERMALINKS%20IX/JULY%202017/21.PRESS.HTML

"In the 2008 campaign, reporters ignored the close and disturbing relationships between the mostly unknown Obama and a cast of unsavory characters: his racist and anti-Semitic pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the neighborhood confidant and former terrorist Bill Ayers, and the wheeler-dealer and soon-to-be felon Tony Rezko.

"Instead, journalists quickly started worshipping candidate Obama in a manner never quite seen before, not even in the days of the iconic liberal presidents like Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy.
[...]

"By the time of 2016 presidential race, the media had lost their credibility as disinterested guardians of objective truth. And while Hillary Clinton in 2016 was no Barack Obama in 2008, reporters still gave her special privileges. CNN talking-head Donna Brazile fed debate questions to the Clinton campaign prior to a Clinton-Sanders televised debate. And the John Podesta Wikileaks trove revealed that a number of marquee reporters were openly colluding with Clinton to defeat Trump.

"Once the media crossed the Rubicon of partisanship, there was no turning back."

Bill Katz's final comment: Read the whole piece. Send it around to literate liberals, both of them. Hanson lays out a scenario that is frightening. The press is not doing the job that the First Amendment intended. How does a free society solve that crucial problem?

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:57 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 231 words, total size 2 kb.